Verified Test Bank Ch12 Incentive-Based Strategies Emission - Environmental Economics 8th Edition Test Bank by Barry Field. DOCX document preview.
Chapter 12
Incentive-Based Strategies: Emission Charges and Subsidies
Multiple Choice Questions
1. There are two types of incentive based environmental policies
A. market-based systems and technology standards.
B. market-based systems and taxes/subsidy programs.
C. taxes/subsidy programs and technology standards.
D. technology standards and emissions standards.
Difficulty: Easy
2. Which of the following is an example of a market based system for pollution control?
A. Taxes on emissions
B. Subsidies for abatement
C. Transferable discharge permits
D. Deposit refund programs
Difficulty: Easy
3. Emission charges is a term that is synonymous with ________________.
A. emission subsidies
B. emission taxes
C. emission prices
D. emission permits
Difficulty: Easy
Emissions (tons/month) | Marginal Abatement Cost | Total Abatement Cost | Total Tax Bill at $100/ton | Total Costs |
10 | 0 | 1000 | ||
9 | 15 | 900 | ||
8 | 30 | 800 | ||
7 | 50 | 700 | ||
6 | 70 | 600 | ||
5 | 100 | 500 | ||
4 | 120 | 400 | ||
3 | 150 | 300 | ||
2 | 185 | 200 | ||
1 | 230 | 100 | ||
0 | 290 | 0 |
4. Refer to the Table above. The firm above faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. If the firm chooses to emit 5 tons/month what is the firm’s total cost?
A. $265
B. $600
C. $765
D. $865
Difficulty: Moderate
5. Refer to the Table above. The firm above faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. If the firm chooses to emit 0 tons/month what is the firm’s total cost?
A. $290
B. $1290
C. $2235
D. $1240
Difficulty: Moderate
6. Refer to the Table above. The firm above faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. At what level of emissions does the firm minimize total abatement cost?
A. 10
B. 5
C. 4
D. 0
Difficulty: Moderate
7. Refer to the Table above. If the firm above faced an emissions charge of $150 per ton/month, at what level of emissions does the firm minimize total abatement cost?
A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 8
Difficulty: Moderate
8. Refer to the Table above. If a regulatory agency simply mandated that the firm could emit a maximum of 5 tons/month and there were no emission charges, what would the firm’s total abatement costs be?
A. $100
B. $265
C. $500
D. $765
Difficulty: Moderate
9. Which of the following statements about abatement subsidies is NOT true?
A. Environmental groups dislike abatement subsidies because they appear to reward polluters.
B. Governments like abatement subsidies because they are relatively inexpensive to implement.
C. Abatement subsidies are popular with firms.
D. Abatement subsidies create perverse incentives for firms to increase emissions when their base levels are being set.
Difficulty: Easy
10. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Polluting firms would prefer emission standards to emission charges.
B. Polluting firms would prefer emission charges to emission standards.
C. In order to arrive at a socially efficient solution, we must use emission standards and not emission charges.
D. None of the above are true.
Difficulty: Easy
11. Refer to the Figure above. If the firm above faced an emissions charge of $ t* per ton/month, at what level does the firm reach a socially efficient solution for emissions?
A. 0
B. e1
C. e*
D. e0
Difficulty: Easy.
12. Refer to the Figure above. If the firm above faced an emissions charge of $ t* per ton/month and the firm is producing at the socially efficient level of emissions, what is the value of the total abatement cost?
A. t* (a+b+c+d)
B. (a+b+c+d+e)
C. (a+b+c+d)
D. (b+d+e)
Difficulty: Moderate
13. Refer to the Figure above. If the firm above faced an emissions charge of $ t* per ton/month, what is the amount of taxation collected?
A. t* (a+b+c+d)
B. (a+b+c+d+e)
C. (a+b+c+d)
D. (b+d+e)
Difficulty: Moderate
14. Refer to the Figure above. If the firm above did not face emissions charges but instead, faced an emission standard of e*, abatement costs would be equal to ____________.
A. (b+d+e+f)
B. (e)
C. (a+b+c+d)
D. (b+d+e)
Difficulty: Moderate
15. Refer to the Figure above If this firm were to consider the difference between an emission tax of t* or an emissions standard of e*, what would the firm conclude is the monetary difference between the two programs?
A. The emissions standard costs less than the taxation program by the amount of (a+b+c+d).
B. The emissions standard costs more than the taxation program by the amount of (a+b+c+d).
C. There is no monetary difference between the two programs.
D. There is not enough information to determine the difference between the two programs.
Difficulty: Moderate
16. Pollution taxes are transfer payments. This means
A. they are not a cost to the firm.
B. they are not a social cost of policy.
C. the costs associated with collection are not considered enforcement costs.
D. all of the above.
Difficulty: Easy
17. When multiple firms are emitting, an emissions tax controls emissions in a way that
A. satisfies the equimarginal principle.
B. encourages firms to emit to the point where there marginal abatement cost equals the tax.
C. equalizes marginal abatement costs across all firms.
D. all of the above.
Difficulty: Moderate
TABLE 1
Marginal abatements costs ($/ton)
Emissions (tons/week) Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3
10 $0 $0 $0
9 4 1 1
8 8 2 2
7 12 4 3
6 16 6 4
5 20 8 5
4 24 12 6
3 28 20 7
2 36 24 8
1 46 28 9
0 58 36 10
18. Refer to Table 1. If the firms above faced an emissions tax of $8, what level of total emissions would occur?
A. 12
B. 15
C. 100
D. 127
Difficulty: Easy
19. Refer to Table 1. If the firms above faced an emissions tax of $8, what level of total abatement costs would be expended?
A. $69
B. 24
C. $24 in abatement costs and $24 in taxes
D. $45 in abatement costs and $24 in taxes
Difficulty: Moderate
20. Refer to Table 1. If the firms above faced an emissions tax of $12, what level of total emissions would occur?
A. 11
B. 21
C. 83
D. 138
Difficulty: Moderate
21. Refer to Table 1. If the firms above faced an emissions tax of $12, what level of total abatement costs would be expended?
A. 33
B. 57
C. $36 in abatement costs and $36 in taxes
D. $21 in abatement costs and $36 in taxes
Difficulty: Moderate
22. Emissions taxes lead to
A. a larger reduction in emissions from firms with lower abatement costs.
B. a larger reduction in emissions from firms with higher abatement costs.
C. an equal distribution of emissions reductions among firms with different abatement costs.
D. a different emission tax applied to firms depending on their abatement costs.
Difficulty: Easy
23. Efficiency results of emissions taxes are achievable
A. if regulators know the structure of each emitting firm’s abatement cost curve.
B. even if regulators do not know the structure of each emitting firm’s abatement cost curve.
C. only when each emitting firm experiences the same abatement cost curve.
D. both A and C.
Difficulty: Easy
24. When emissions are nonuniform and some sources produce higher damages than others
A. uniform emissions charges produce efficient levels of emissions.
B. firms that produce greater damages must be charged higher emissions charges in order to secure efficient levels of emissions.
C. the damage reduction per dollar spent in reducing emissions, including emissions taxes and abatement costs, should be equalized across sources.
D. both B and C.
Difficulty: Moderate
25. If regulators are considering an emissions tax, they will be more uncertain about the resulting level of emissions if
A. firms in the industry experience a steep abatement cost curve.
B. firms in the industry experience a flat abatement cost curve.
C. the firms are located in a rural area.
D. the firms are located in an urban area.
Difficulty: Easy
26. Refer to the Figure above. A firm facing an emissions charge of t and an abatement cost curve of MAC1 will emit e1 and
A. face abatement costs of (a+b+c+d+e).
B. face abatement costs of (a+b+d+e).
C. face abatement costs of (d+e) and taxation charges of (a+b+c).
D. face abatement costs of (d+e) and taxation charges of (a+b).
Difficulty: Easy
27. Refer to the Figure above. The firm is facing an emissions charge of t and an abatement cost curve of MAC1. If the firm is able to lower its abatement cost curve to MAC2, it will
A. emit at level e1 and save (d+e).
B. emit at level e1 and save (d).
C. emit at level e2 and save (c+d).
D. emit at level e1 and save (d+e).
Difficulty: Moderate
28. Refer to the Figure above. The firm is facing an emissions charge of t and an abatement cost curve of MAC1. If the firm is able to lower its abatement cost curve to MAC2, and it now faces an emissions standard of e1, the firm will
A. emit at level e1 and save (d+e).
B. emit at level e1 and save (d).
C. emit at level e2 and save (c+d).
D. emit at level e1 and save (d+e).
Difficulty: Moderate
29. Which of the following is true when emission charges are compared to emission standards?
A. Polluters pay both emission charges and abatement cost charges under a policy of emissions charges, but only pay for abatement costs when emission standards are in place.
B. Polluters automatically reduce their emissions when abatement costs decline under a policy of emissions charges, but do not reduce their emissions automatically when standards are in place and abatement costs decline.
C. Polluters will realize bigger pollution control cost reductions from R&D efforts under a policy of emission charges than under a policy of emission standards.
D. all of the above.
Difficulty: Moderate
Emissions (tons/month) | Marginal Abatement Cost | Total Abatement Cost | Total Subsidy at $120/ton |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 15 | 15 | 120 |
8 | 30 | 45 | 240 |
7 | 50 | 95 | 360 |
6 | 70 | 165 | 480 |
5 | 95 | 260 | 600 |
4 | 120 | 375 | 720 |
3 | 150 | 525 | 840 |
2 | 185 | 710 | 960 |
1 | 230 | 940 | 1,080 |
0 | 290 | 1,230 | 1,200 |
30. Refer to the Table above. What level of emissions would a firm choose given the marginal abatement cost and the subsidy level detailed above?
A. Indeterminate
B. 0
C. 4
D. 9
Difficulty: Moderate
31. A two-part emission charge
A. means changing different rates at different emission levels of a single pollutant
B. means some polluters are charged zero, while other polluters are charged a positive fee for the same emission level
C. means some polluters earn a subsidy while other polluters pay a charge
D. allows polluters to share emissions charges between two facilities
32. The primary source of carbon dioxide emissions is
A. deforestation
B. burning fossil fuels
C. exhaling by all animal life
D. rotting plant debris
33. Placing a carbon tax “upstream” means
A. applying a carbon tax to retailers (online and brick & mortar stores)
B. applying a carbon tax to polluters along rivers and other waterbodies
C. applying a carbon tax when fossil fuels are first sold
D. applying a carbon tax at the fossil fuel pump for automobiles
34. Which of the following are examples of deposit-refund systems?
A. beverage containers in some states in the U.S.
B. new cars in Sweden
C. waste oil in Germany
D. all of above
35. Abatement subsidies can increase total emissions when
A. the pollution control technology supported by the subsidy is outdated
B. the number of polluting firms entering the industry increases to gain the subsidies
C. marginal abatement costs decrease while marginal damages remain the same
D. marginal damages decrease while marginal abatement costs remain the same
Document Information
Connected Book
Explore recommendations drawn directly from what you're reading
Chapter 10 Liability Property Voluntary
DOCX Ch. 10
Chapter 11 Command-And-Control Strategies The Case Of Standards
DOCX Ch. 11
Chapter 12 Incentive-Based Strategies Emission Charges And Subsidies
DOCX Ch. 12 Current
Chapter 13 Incentive-Based Strategies Market Trading Systems
DOCX Ch. 13
Chapter 14 Federal Water Pollution-Control Policy
DOCX Ch. 14