Emotion And Cognition Full Test Bank Chapter 10 - Test Bank | Emotion 3e Shiota by Michelle N. Shiota. DOCX document preview.
SHIOTA & KALAT, EMOTION 3rd edition TEST BANK, CHAPTER 4
Multiple Choice
- Which of the following is the best definition of appraisal, in the context of emotion theory?
- Our understanding of how much a stimulus is likely to be worth, in terms of value
- The objective implications of some event for our goals and well-being
- The meaning our culture ascribes to a stimulus or event
- Our subjective interpretation of what a stimulus or event means for our own goals, concerns, and well-being
- Studies measuring electrical signals caused by brain activity or facial muscle movement have found that people can detect and respond to emotional stimuli in less than second(s).
- 50 milliseconds, or 1/20th of a
- 500 milliseconds, or 1/2 of a
- 1
- 2
- Research evidence suggests that emotion-eliciting appraisals:
- occur rapidly, without conscious analysis of the situation.
- develop slowly, after thinking consciously about the situation for a while.
- are influenced by emotions that preceded the current situation, as well as the situation itself.
- Research has documented all three of these appraisal processes.
- Richard Lazarus proposed that emotions are elicited by the perception of “core relational themes” in environmental stimuli and/or events. This hypothesis about the causes of emotion is mostly closely aligned with which major theory of emotion?
- Basic/discrete emotions theory
- Core affect theory
- The component process model
- The evaluative space model
- According to Richard Lazarus (1991), the core relational theme evoking the emotion of guilt is:
- an uncertain, existential threat.
- having transgressed a moral imperative.
- failing to live up to an ego-ideal.
- being moved by another’s suffering and wanting to help.
- According to Richard Lazarus (1991), the core relational theme evoking the emotion of pride is:
- progress toward achieving a goal.
- wanting something someone else already has.
- taking credit for a valued object or accomplishment.
- feeling entitled to affection from another person.
- According to Richard Lazarus (1991), the core relational theme evoking the emotion of anger is:
- a demeaning offense against me and mine.
- an indigestible object or idea.
- resenting a third person for threat to another’s affection for you.
- someone blocking or interfering with achievement of your goal.
- According to Richard Lazarus (1991), the core relational theme evoking the emotion of sadness is:
- wanting something that you cannot have
- perceiving that another person is suffering
- experiencing an irrevocable loss
- feeling physically tired and depleted
- Klaus Scherer has proposed that emotions are elicited by appraisals along dimensions such as novelty, unexpectedness, pleasantness, certainty, and control. This hypothesis about the causes of emotion is mostly closely aligned with which major theory of emotion?
- Basic/discrete emotions theory
- The evaluative space model
- Core affect theory
- The component process model
- Which of the following major theories of emotion allows for an emotion blend – the simultaneous experience of multiple emotions?
- Basic/discrete emotions theory
- Core affect theory
- The component process model
- All three of these theories allow for emotion blends.
- Which of the following best summarizes the distinction between primary and secondary appraisal, in Richard Lazarus’ theory?
- Primary appraisal assesses what caused the situation; secondary appraisal assesses what is likely to happen next.
- Primary appraisal assesses the eliciting situation and its implications for your own goals; secondary appraisal assesses your ability to cope with the situation.
- Primary appraisal assesses your own role in creating the situation; secondary appraisal assesses other people’s role in creating it.
- Primary appraisal assesses implications of the situation for you and your goals; secondary appraisal assesses implications of the situation for other people’s goals.
- According to both the core relational theme and dimensional approaches to appraisal, the way in which we appraise a given situation is strongly influenced by , and the links between appraisal and emotional response are .
- cultural learning; also culturally learned
- cultural learning; innate and universal
- universal rules; culturally learned
- universal rules; also innate and universal
- Which of the following best describes the difference in physiological responding when people interpret the same task as a threat vs. challenge?
- Cardiac activity increases and the blood vessels contract in threat, but not in challenge.
- Cardiac activity increases in threat but decreases in challenge; in both, the blood vessels contract.
- Although cardiac activity increases in both, the blood vessels contract in challenge and relax in threat.
- Although cardiac activity increases in both, the blood vessels contract in threat and relax in challenge.
- Which of the following best describes the main implications of the Tomaka and colleagues (1997) threat/challenge study described in your textbook?
- People will show different physiological response profiles in the same situation, if they appraise that situation differently.
- People’s appraisals of a situation can be manipulated experimentally.
- People have control over how they appraise stressful situations.
- Physiological stress responding includes both changes in heart rate and changes in vascular pressure.
- In the study by Klaus Scherer (1997), examining the appraisal dimension profiles associated with specific emotions in countries around the world, the primary differences between anger and fear were seen in .
- unpleasantness and coping potential
- unfairness and coping potential
- immorality and unfairness
- unfairness and self-consistency
- In the study by Klaus Scherer (1997), examining the appraisal dimension profiles associated with specific emotions in countries around the world, the highest cross-cultural consistency was observed for .
- joy
- sadness
- fear
- disgust
- In the study by Klaus Scherer (1997), examining the appraisal profiles associated with specific emotions in countries around the world, which appraisal dimensions showed the greatest tendency to differ across cultures?
- unfairness and coping
- expectedness and coping
- unfairness and immorality
- expectedness and goal obstruction
- Which of the following accurately describes the mere exposure effect?
- People associate discrete emotions with abstract stimuli (such as Japanese writing characters), even when exposed to them for the first time.
- People report greater preference for abstract stimuli that they have seen a greater number of times, though they are unaware of the link between exposure and preference.
- People report greater liking for people to whom they have exposed themselves more, by revealing personal information.
- None of the above is an accurate description of the mere exposure effect.
- Research evidence suggests that:
- at the dispositional level, people who are more prone to blaming other people in unpleasant situations also tend to experience anger more frequently.
- at the situational level, most people report feeling angry only when they blame another person for something bad that has happened.
- people who experience anger in response to one situation are more likely to perceive ambiguous words, presented later on, as threatening.
- Evidence suggests that all of the above are true.
- Which of the following does NOT characterize the appraisal profile associated with anger, according to research by Klaus Scherer?
- unexpectedness
- unpleasantness
- low controllability
- All of the appraisals above are associated with anger.
- According to Berkowitz’s (1990) cognitive neoassociationistic (CNA) model, which of the following can lead to the experience of anger?
- Pain or other discomfort
- Goal blockage
- Appraisal of another’s hostile intent
- According to the CNA model, all of the above can lead to anger.
- Which of the following best summarizes Berkowitz’s (1990) cognitive neoassociationistic (CNA) model of anger generation?
- Any unpleasant event or sensation facilitates anger and aggression.
- Any event that causes frustration, or goal blockage, will cause anger.
- Any unpleasant event for which we blame another person will elicit anger.
- Any event we have previously associated with a negative outcome will lead to anger.
- Which of the following hypothetical study results would NOT support Berkowitz’s (1990) cognitive neoassociationistic (CNA) model of anger generation?
- In a study of participants recovering from a painful injury, those who have taken acetaminophen (an over-the-counter painkiller) are less angered by a staged computer breakdown than those who have taken a placebo.
- In a study of appraisals in specific unpleasant situations, the correlation of external causation appraisal with self-reported anger intensity is .87.
- In a study of emotional responses to repeated, loud noise blasts, participants told they could stop the noises by asking the experimenter to end the study over an intercom reported feeling anger, whereas participants who believed they were locked in the room and had no way to communicate with the experimenter reported feeling fear.
- All of the results described above would support the CNA model.
Document Information
Connected Book
Explore recommendations drawn directly from what you're reading
Quick Navigation
Benefits
Immediately available after payment
Answers are available after payment
ZIP file includes all related files
Files are in Word format (DOCX)
Check the description to see the contents of each ZIP file
We do not share your information with any third party