Chapter.10 Third parties Exam Prep 2nd Edition - Test Bank | Law of Contract 2e Smith & Davies by JC Smith, Paul S. Davies. DOCX document preview.

Chapter.10 Third parties Exam Prep 2nd Edition

Type: true-false

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 01

01) The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 replaces the common law on privity.

a. True

b. False

Type: true-false

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 02

02) The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 has created a major exception to the rule that a contract between A and B cannot impose duties on C.

a. True

b. False

Type: true-false

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 03

03) If parties stipulate in their contract that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 does not apply, that provision has no effect.

a. True

b. False

Type: multiple response question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 04

04) Which of the following options explain why the rules developed by the common law on privity remain relevant even after the enactment of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999? Please select all that apply.

a. The 1999 Act does not apply to all classes of contract.

b. Contracting parties can choose to exclude the operation of the 1999 Act if they wish.

c. The 1999 Act does not affect rights or remedies otherwise available under the common law.

d. The common law takes precedence over the 1999 Act in the event of conflict.

Type: multiple choice question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 05

05) Why did the claimant’s action in Tweddle v Atkinson fail?

a. The contract in question was a domestic agreement and thus not enforceable.

b. The claimant was not a promisee to the contract in question.

c. The claimant had not provided consideration for the promise.

d. None of the options provided is correct.

Type: multiple choice question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 06

06) How did the Privy Council in The Eurymedon overcome the difficult question of consideration in order to hold that the stevedores could rely on the exemption clauses in the bill of lading?

a. The bill of lading expressly provided that the stevedores could rely on the exemption clauses.

b. As agents of the carrier who was party to the bill of lading, the stevedores did not need to provide consideration to benefit from the exemption clauses.

c. A fiction of a ‘collateral contract’ between the shipper and stevedores was employed, under which the stevedores provided consideration.

d. None of the options provided is correct.

Type: multiple response question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 07

07) What is the basis of the decision of the House of Lords in Panatown v Alfred McAlpine Construction?

a. A claim could not be brought for the third party’s loss because a deed had been executed by the defendant in favour of the third party.

b. A claim could be brought for the third party’s loss because a deed had been executed by the defendant in favour of the third party.

c. A claim could not be brought because it was not foreseeable at the time of contracting that loss would be caused to the defendant from a breach of contract.

d. None of these options are correct.

Type: multiple response question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 08

08) Under what circumstances would a person who is not party to a contract be able to enforce a term in his own right under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999? Please select all that apply.

a. The contract expressly provides that the person can enforce it.

b. That person thought that he was able to enforce it.

c. The term in question purports to confer a benefit on him.

d. That person is not expressly identified in the contract.

Type: multiple response question

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 09

09) When might you be liable for another’s contractual obligations on the acquisition of property?

a. If the property is land, and you are aware that it is subject to a negative covenant restricting its use.

b. If the property is a chattel, and you are aware that it is subject to a negative covenant restricting its use..

c. Both options are correct.

d. Neither options are correct.

Type: true-false

Title: Chapter 10 - Question 10

10) Would A be liable if he knowingly induced B to break his contract with C?

a. True

b. False

Document Information

Document Type:
DOCX
Chapter Number:
10
Created Date:
Aug 21, 2025
Chapter Name:
Chapter 10 Third parties
Author:
JC Smith, Paul S. Davies

Connected Book

Test Bank | Law of Contract 2e Smith & Davies

By JC Smith, Paul S. Davies

Test Bank General
View Product →

$24.99

100% satisfaction guarantee

Buy Full Test Bank

Benefits

Immediately available after payment
Answers are available after payment
ZIP file includes all related files
Files are in Word format (DOCX)
Check the description to see the contents of each ZIP file
We do not share your information with any third party