Ch15 Exam Prep Joint Costs And Decision[1]making - Chapter Test Bank | Cost Accounting & Analytics 1e by Karen Congo Farmer. DOCX document preview.
CHAPTER 15
JOINT COSTS AND DECISION-MAKING
CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- Outline the rationale for joint costing.
- Explain the three methods of allocating joint costs.
- Determine the factors in deciding whether to sell now or process further.
- Describe the two methods of treating by-products and scrap.
Current count is:
Knowledge: 29
Comprehension: 25
Application: 52
Analysis: 25
Evaluation: 0
Synthesis: 0
Total: 131
Number and percentage of questions:
Easy: 30
Medium: 86
Hard: 15
Question types:
Multiple Choice: 105
Short Answer: 5
Brief Exercises: 11
Exercises: 8
Problems: 2
MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS
- A common cost
a. uses a common set of production costs, used in one common production process, to produce one product.
b. uses a common set of production costs used in one common production process to yield two products simultaneously.
c. uses a multiple set of production costs, used in one common production process to yield more than one product simultaneously.
d. uses a common set of production costs used in one common production process to yield more than one product simultaneously.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Products with a substantial value produced simultaneously by the same process up to a split-off point are called
a. by-products.
b. joint products.
c. separable products.
d. either by-products or joint products.
Ans: B, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The split-off point is
a. the point in the process the products become separate and identifiable.
b. the point in the process, the company determines which product to process further.
c. the point in the production process where no further processing is needed.
d. the point in the process the product is ready to sell.
Ans: A, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- A secondary product recovered in producing a primary product during the joint process that has future use is called
a. scrap.
b. waste.
c. a by-product.
d. a joint product.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- All of the following statements about joint costs are true except:
a. Allocation is not necessary when costs are incurred using a joint process.
b. Joint costs are the costs incurred jointly in the production of two or more products.
c. The costs cannot be directly assigned to any one product involved.
d. Joint costs are incurred when making multiple products.
Ans: A, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The cost of fertilizing and harvesting sunflowers is an example of:
a. joint products.
b. by-products
c. joint costs.
d. cost allocation.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Molasses would be considered what type of unintended output from refining sugar?
a. Joint product.
b. Scrap.
c. Waste.
d. By-product.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Harvesting of corn produces corn husks. In a joint process, what type of unintended output are corn husks?
a. Joint product.
b. Scrap.
c. Waste.
d. By-product.
Ans: B, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- In a joint process, waste would be considered all of the following except:
a. Waste is an unintended output.
b. Waste has economic value.
c. Waste is disposed of.
d. Waste is a by-product.
Ans: B, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Once a company classifies an unintended output of the joint process as a by-product, waste, or scrap,
a. the company will continue that classification until it no longer produces the product.
b. the company will evaluate the classifications yearly.
c. the classifications will remain fluid and can change as the usefulness of the products changes.
d. the classifications will change based on the profitability of the product.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The following costs are included in joint costs:
a. direct materials.
b. direct labor.
c. direct material and direct labor.
d. direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Separable costs are also known as
a. by-products.
b. joint costs.
c. further processing costs.
d. common costs.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Further processing costs are costs that
a. are incurred within the joint process.
b. are incurred to sell the product as is.
c. are incurred to create a by-product.
d. are incurred to process the product further.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- All of the following statements about joint products are true, except:
a. All joint products can be sold at the split-off point.
b. A product that is processed further should be sold for a higher price.
c. Management must make a decision at split-off to process further or sell the product.
d. There is no economic value attached to some products at the split-off point.
Ans: A, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Xander incurs costs of $20,000 for direct materials, $15,000 for direct labor, and $10,000 for manufacturing overhead. The costs incurred resulted in a single process that resulted in two products, Bugs, and Rugs. Bugs can be sold at split-off for $60,000 or be processed further at a cost of $15,000. The new product, Dubs, can be sold for $105,000. How much are Xander’s joint costs?
a. $30,000.
b. $35,000.
c. $45,000.
d. $60,000.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $20,000 + $15,000 + $10,000 = $45,000.
DM + DL + MOH (Before split-off)
- When manufacturing a wooden chair, sawdust would be an example of
a. Joint product.
b. Scrap.
c. Waste.
d. By-product.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following is a by-product?
a. whole milk.
b. lumber.
c. honey.
d. fertilizer.
Ans: D, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following statements best describes a by-product?
a. A product that has a selling price similar to that of the main product.
b. A product that is created along with the main product and the sales value does not cover its cost of production.
c. A product that is produced from material that would otherwise be scrapped.
d. A product that has a lower unit selling price than the main product.
Ans: C, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following are identifiable as different individual products before split-off for cost accumulate purposes?
Option By-products Joint products
A No No
B Yes No
C Yes Yes
D No Yes
a. A.
b. B.
c. C.
d. D.
Ans: A, LO 1, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Joint costs are
a. separable costs.
b. allocated on the basis of cause-and-effect relationships.
c. further processing costs.
d. allocated arbitrarily.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The _____ method of allocating joint costs uses pounds of product produced.
a. sales value at split-off.
b. net realizable value.
c. physical quantities.
d. weighted average.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The method of allocating joint costs that would assign the same amount of cost per unit to two joint products that sell for $5 and $15, respectively, is the
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- When there is no ready market price available for an individual product at the split-off point, which method of allocation should be used?
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The sales value at split-off method allocates joint costs of production using the
a. prospective sales values of the process’s total production and the relative proportion of each product’s sales value to the total.
b. relative proportion of each product’s sales value to the total.
c. final sales value less further processing costs after the split-off point.
d. prospective sales values of the process’s total production.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which allocation method recognizes that costs incurred after the split-off point are part of the cost total on which profit is expected to be earned?
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following statements is true regarding the consideration of allocation costs at split-off?
a. Allocating joint costs using the average costs is the quickest and most accurate process.
b. The sales value at the split-off method is the only true way to allocate joint costs to joint products.
c. There are three methods that can be used to allocate costs.
d. If there are two products equal in value at the split-off point, it would make the most sense to use an even allocation of costs.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The sales price at split-off is used to allocate
Option Cost Beyond Split-Off Joint Costs
A No No
B Yes No
C Yes Yes
D No Yes
a. A.
b. B.
c. C.
d. D.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The net realizable value (NRV) of a product is the
a. final sales value less additional processing costs and allocated joint costs.
b. final sales value less additional processing costs.
c. sales at split-off less additional process costs.
d. sales at split-off less additional processing costs and allocated joint costs.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- If the sales price at the split-off point is available and reliable, the best method of allocating joint product costs is the
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- If the sales price at the split-off point is not available, but the net realizable value is available and reliable, the best method of allocating joint product costs is the
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- If the sales price at the split-off point and the net realizable value is not available, the best method of allocating joint product costs is the
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- If the necessary information is available, which method is preferred when allocating joint costs?
a. sales value at split-off method.
b. net realizable value method.
c. physical quantities method.
d. direct allocation method.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The sales value at split-off method is preferred. All the following are true regarding the reasons, except:
a. Sales prices at the split-off point are objective.
b. The sales value at split-off method measures the true economic value of a company.
c. The sales value at split-off method measures benefits returned to the company.
d. The ROI (return on investment) is accurately measured and the point of being in business.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- The biggest challenge of the physical quantities method is
a. the economic value returned to the company is accurately measured.
b. the significant variability in end prices.
c. no common denominator.
d. companies will fully expense joint costs in the periods they are incurred.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- If a company has no estimates to allocate joint product costs, a company will typically
a. use the sales value at split-off method.
b. use the net realizable value method.
c. use the physical quantities method.
d. fully expense the joint costs in the period they are incurred.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following would not be considered a physical measure to allocate joint costs using the physical quantities method?
a. feet of lumber.
b. dollars of labor.
c. ounces of gold.
d. tons of steel.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
- Cisco Company manufactures three products, A, B & C. These three products are created through a joint process that costs $26,000. The following data is provided for the three products:
Sales Value
Product Units Produced at Split-off
A 6,000 $2,500
B 10,000 5,000
C 8,000 3,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to Product A using the sales-value-at-split-off method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $1,010.
b. $6,190.
c. $6,500.
d. $14,857.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $2,500 ÷ ($2,500 + $5,000 + $3,000) x $26,000 = $6,190.
A sales value. ÷ (A sales value. + B Sales value. + C sales value.) x joint costs
- Cisco Company manufactures three products, A, B & C. These three products are created through a joint process that costs $26,000. The following data is provided for the three products:
Sales Value
Product Units Produced at Split-off
A 6,000 $2,500
B 10,000 5,000
C 8,000 3,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to Product B using the sales-value-at-split-off method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $2,019.
b. $10,833.
c. $12,381.
d. $24,762.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $5,000 ÷ ($2,500 + $5,000 + $3,000) x $26,000 = $12,381.
B sales value. ÷ (A sales value. + B Sales value. + C sales value.) x joint costs
- Cisco Company manufactures three products, A, B & C. These three products are created through a joint process that costs $26,000. The following data is provided for the three products:
Sales Value
Product Units Produced at Split-off
A 6,000 $2,500
B 10,000 5,000
C 8,000 3,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to Product C using the sales-value-at-split-off method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $1,212.
b. $7,429.
c. $8,667.
d. $19,810.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $3,000 ÷ ($2,500 + $5,000 + $3,000) x $26,000 = $7,429.
C sales value. ÷ (A sales value. + B Sales value. + C sales value.) x joint costs
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to the 25 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $40,000.
b. $21,250.
c. $25,449.
d. $26,772.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($50,000 - $10,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $26,772.
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs)
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to the 30 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $43,000.
b. $25,500.
c. $27,994.
d. $28,780.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($55,000 - $12,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $28,780.
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs)
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the amount of joint costs assigned to the 50 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $44,000.
b. $29,449.
c. $31,557.
d. $38,250.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($62,000 - $18,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $29,449.
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs)
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the gross margin for the 25 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method to allocate joint costs? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $40,000.
b. $50,000.
c. $13,228.
d. $26,772.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($50,000 - $10,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $26,772.
$50,000 - $10,000 - $26,772 = $13,228
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs) = joint costs
Sales value – further processing costs– joint costs
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the gross margin for the 30 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method to allocate joint costs? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $43,000.
b. $55,000.
c. $14,220.
d. $28,780.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($55,000 - $12,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $28,780.
$55,000 - $12,000 - $28,780 = $14,220
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs)
Sales value – further processing costs– joint costs
- Tober Inc. operates a lumber yard. Tober purchases the raw materials for $50,000 and incurs additional processing costs of $35,000 to obtain three observable joint products. Further processing and final sales values for the products are as follows:
Further Final
Product Processing Costs Sales Value
25 ft board $10,000 $50,000
30 ft board 12,000 55,000
50 ft board 18,000 62,000
What is the gross margin for the 50 ft board using the net realizable value (NRV) method to allocate joint costs? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $44,000.
b. $62,000.
c. $14,551.
d. $29,449.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($50,000 - $10,000) + ($55,000 - $12,000) + ($62,000 – $18,000) = $127,000
($62,000 - $18,000) ÷ $127,000 x ($50,000 + $35,000) = $29,449.
$62,000 - $18,000 - $29,449 = $14,551
(25 ft sales value – 25 ft costs) + (30 ft sales value – 30 ft costs) +(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) = total NRV
(50 ft sales value – 50 ft costs) ÷ total NRV x (raw mat. + additional processing costs)
Sales value – further processing costs– joint costs
- Expo manufacturing produces four different drinks. The joint process incurs costs of $250,000. The following information is related to the four products.
Weight Selling Price
Product Units Produced per Unit per Unit
Beatle 5,000 8 oz $1.10
Grasshopper 3,750 12 oz 1.50
Locust 2,500 16 oz 1.95
Buggy 1,250 24 oz 2.50
Using the physical quantities methods of allocating joint costs, how much joint costs would be allocated to Beatle? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $33,333.
b. $39,007.
c. $70,362.
d. $100,000.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 8 + 12 + 16 + 24 = 60 total oz
8 ÷ 60 x $250,000 = $33,333.
beat oz + grass oz + loc oz + bug oz = total oz
beat oz ÷ total oz x joint costs
- Expo manufacturing produces four different drinks. The joint process incurs costs of $250,000. The following information is related to the four products.
Weight Selling Price
Product Units Produced per Unit per Unit
Beatle 5,000 8 oz $1.10
Grasshopper 3,750 12 oz 1.50
Locust 2,500 16 oz 1.95
Buggy 1,250 24 oz 2.50
Using the physical quantities methods of allocating joint costs, how much joint costs would be allocated to Grasshopper? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $50,000.
b. $53,191.
c. $63,966.
d. $75,000.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 8 + 12 + 16 + 24 = 60 total oz
12 ÷ 60 x $250,000 = $50,000.
beat oz + grass oz + loc oz + bug oz = total oz
grass oz ÷ total oz x joint costs
- Expo manufacturing produces four different drinks. The joint process incurs costs of $250,000. The following information is related to the four products.
Weight Selling Price
Product Units Produced per Unit per Unit
Beatle 5,000 8 oz $1.10
Grasshopper 3,750 12 oz 1.50
Locust 2,500 16 oz 1.95
Buggy 1,250 24 oz 2.50
Using the physical quantities methods of allocating joint costs, how much joint costs would be allocated to Locust? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $50,000.
b. $62,367.
c. $66,667.
d. $69,149.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 8 + 12 + 16 + 24 = 60 total oz
16 ÷ 60 x $250,000 = $66,667.
beat oz + grass oz + loc oz + bug oz = total oz
loc oz ÷ total oz x joint costs
- Expo manufacturing produces four different drinks. The joint process incurs costs of $250,000. The following information is related to the four products.
Weight Selling Price
Product Units Produced per Unit per Unit
Beatle 5,000 8 oz $1.10
Grasshopper 3,750 12 oz 1.50
Locust 2,500 16 oz 1.95
Buggy 1,250 24 oz 2.50
Using the physical quantities methods of allocating joint costs, how much joint costs would be allocated to Buggy? (Round the nearest whole dollar)
a. $25,000.
b. $53,305.
c. $88,652.
d. $100,000.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 8 + 12 + 16 + 24 = 60 total oz
24 ÷ 60 x $250,000 = $100,000.
beat oz + grass oz + loc oz + bug oz = total oz
bug oz ÷ total oz x joint costs
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is reliable, what are the joint costs allocated to B752, using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $4.26 million.
b. $4.50 million.
c. $4.67 million.
d. $5 million.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $230 + $310 = $540
$230 ÷ $540 x $10 = $4.26
B752sale at split-off + B797 sale at split-off = total sale at split-off
B752sale at split-off ÷ total sale at split-off x joint process costs
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is reliable, what is the gross margin for B752, using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $215 million.
b. $215.5 million.
c. $215.74 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $230 + $310 = $540
$230 ÷ $540 x $10 = $4.26
$420 - $200 - $4.26 = $215.74
B752sale at split-off + B797 sale at split-off = total sale at split-off
B752sale at split-off ÷ total sale at split-off x joint process costs = B752 joint cost
B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost – B752 joint cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is reliable, what is the joint costs allocated to B797, using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $5 million.
b. $5.33 million.
c. $5.50 million.
d. $5.74 million.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $230 + $310 = $540
$310 ÷ $540 x $10 = $5.74
B752sale at split-off + B797 sale at split-off = total sale at split-off
B797sale at split-off ÷ total sale at split-off x joint process costs
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is reliable, what is the gross margin for B797, using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $214.26 million.
b. $214.50 million.
c. $215 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $230 + $310 = $540
$310 ÷ $540 x $10 = $5.74
$480 - $260 - $5.74 = $214.26
B752sale at split-off + B797 sale at split-off = total sale at split-off
B797sale at split-off ÷ total sale at split-off x joint process costs = B797 joint cost
B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost – B797 joint cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is not reliable, but the final sales value and further processing costs are reliable, what is the joint costs allocated to B752 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $4.26 million.
b. $4.50 million.
c. $4.67 million.
d. $5 million.
Ans: D, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($420 - $200) + ($480 - $260) = $440
($420 - $200) ÷ $440 x $10 = $5
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) + (B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) = total NRV
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) ÷ total NRV x joint process costs
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is not reliable, but the final sales value and further processing costs are reliable, what is the gross margin for B752 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $215 million.
b. $215.5 million.
c. $215.74 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($420 - $200) + ($480 - $260) = $440
($420 - $200) ÷ $440 x $10 = $5
$420 - $200 - $5 = $215
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) + (B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) = total NRV
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) ÷ total NRV x joint process costs = B752 joint process cost
B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost - B752 joint process cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is not reliable, but the final sales value and further processing costs are reliable, what is the joint costs allocated to B797 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $5 million.
b. $5.33 million.
c. $5.50 million.
d. $5.74 million.
Ans: A, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($420 - $200) + ($480 - $260) = $440
($480 - $260) ÷ $440 x $10 = $5
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) + (B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) = total NRV
(B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) ÷ total NRV x joint process costs
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off provided is not reliable, but the final sales value and further processing costs are reliable, what is the gross margin for B797 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $214.26 million.
b. $214.50 million.
c. $215 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: ($420 - $200) + ($480 - $260) = $440
($480 - $260) ÷ $440 x $10 = $5
$480 - $260 - $5 = $215
(B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost) + (B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) = total NRV
(B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost) ÷ total NRV x joint process costs = B797 joint process cost
B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost - B797 joint process cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off and the final sales values provided are not reliable, what is the joint costs allocated to B752 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $4.26 million.
b. $4.50 million.
c. $4.67 million.
d. $5 million.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 90,000 + 110,000 = 200,000
90,000 ÷ 200,000 x 10 = 4.5
B752 lbs + B797 lbs = total lbs
B752 lbs ÷ total lbs x joint cost = B752 joint cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off and the final sales values provided are not reliable, what is the gross margin for B752 using the appropriate method of allocation
a. $215 million.
b. $215.5 million.
c. $215.74 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 90,000 + 110,000 = 200,000
90,000 ÷ 200,000 x 10 = 4.5
$420 - $200 - $4.5 = $215.5
B752 lbs + B797 lbs = total lbs
B752 lbs ÷ total lbs x joint cost = B752 joint cost
B752 final sales– B752 further processing cost - B752 joint process cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off and the final sales values provided are not reliable, what is the joint costs allocated to B797 using the appropriate method of allocation?
a. $5 million.
b. $5.33 million.
c. $5.50 million.
d. $5.74 million.
Ans: C, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 90,000 + 110,000 = 200,000
110,000 ÷ 200,000 x 10 = 5.5
B752 lbs + B797 lbs = total lbs
B797 lbs ÷ total lbs x joint cost = B797 joint cost
- Sky airlines produces two different aircrafts. The joint process incurs costs of $10 million. Both aircrafts can be sold at split-off or processed further to increase the final sales value. The following information is related to the two products. (all costs are recorded in millions)
Weight per Final Further Sales Value at
Product Units Unit (lbs) Sales Value Processing Costs at Split-Off
B752 15 90,000 $420 $200 $230
B797 25 110,000 480 260 310
If the sales price at split-off and the final sales values provided are not reliable, what is the gross margin for B797 using the appropriate method of allocation
a. $214.26 million.
b. $214.50 million.
c. $215 million.
d. $220 million.
Ans: B, LO 2, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Measurement IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 90,000 + 110,000 = 200,000
110,000 ÷ 200,000 x 10 = 5.5
$480 - $260 - $5.5 = $214.5
B752 lbs + B797 lbs = total lbs
B797 lbs ÷ total lbs x joint cost = B797 joint cost
B797 final sales– B797 further processing cost - B797 joint process cost
- When deciding the point at which a product should be sold to maximize profits in a joint product costing and analysis, which one of the following costs is relevant?
a. Separable costs after the split-off point.
b. Sales salaries for the period when the units were produced.
c. Joint costs to the split-off point.
d. Purchase costs of the materials required for the joint products.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- When considering whether to sell or process a product further, joint costs
a. are essential the decision-making process.
b. are considered sunk costs.
c. will change depending on which decision is made.
d. are considered opportunity costs.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Another term for joint costs is
a. future costs.
b. opportunity costs.
c. incremental costs
d. sunk costs.
Ans: D, LO 3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Joint costs are only relevant
a. when deciding whether to sell or process further.
b. when considering the opportunity costs.
c. at the split-off point.
d. when producing the final product(s).
Ans: C, LO 3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- When deciding whether to sell or process further, companies will use
a. joint costs.
b. separable costs.
c. the net realizable value.
d. the incremental costs.
Ans: C, LO 3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following statements is false regarding an incremental analysis?
a. If the sales value at split-off is greater than the NRV, sell after further processing.
b. If the sales value at split-off is less than the NRV, sell after further processing.
c. If the sales value at split-off is greater than the NRV, sell it without further processing.
d. The sales value at split-off and the NRV need to be analyzed to determine whether to sell or process further.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- When a company is deciding whether to sell at split-off or process further, all the following assumptions are made except:
a. The marketplace has been assessed, and there is sufficient demand to meet the company’s target income.
b. The decision is aligned with the organizational objectives.
c. The company has the capacity and capability to process the product further.
d. The decision will lead the company towards minimizing profits.
Ans: D, LO 3, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- FlyDucks is deciding whether to sell its current model as is or process it further to create an enhanced model. The unit cost of the current model is $24 and would sell for $52. The company would incur further processing costs of $17 per unit and would sell for $68. What should FlyDucks do?
a. Process further, the company will make an additional $23 per unit.
b. Process further, the company will make an additional $11 per unit.
c. Sell the current model, the company will show an increased profit of $1 per unit.
d. Sell the current model, the company will show an increased profit of $16 per unit.
Ans: C, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $52 - $24 = $28; $68 - $24 - $17 = $27; $28 - $27 = $1 (sell current model)
(current model selling price – cost of current model) – (enhanced model selling price – enhanced model additional cost) = sell current model
- Coyote Company spent $8,000 to produce its new device. This new device can be sold as-is for $10,000 or processed further at an additional cost of $3,000 and will then be sold for $14,000. Which amounts are relevant to the decision about the new device?
a. $8,000, $10,000, $3,000 and $14,000.
b. $10,000, $3,000 and $14,000.
c. $8,000, $3,000 and $14,000.
d. $8,000, $10,000, and $14,000.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Stars Unlimited produces four products through a joint process that incurs costs of $150,000. Information for these products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Sales Value at Final Further
Product Produced at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Gemini 3,000 $10,000 $15,000 $2,500
Taurus 5,000 30,000 35,000 3,000
Leo 4,000 20,000 25,000 4,000
Virgo 6,000 40,000 45,000 6,000
Which, if any, products should be processed further?
a. All products should be processed further.
b. Gemini and Taurus should be processed further.
c. Gemini, Virgo, and Leo should be processed further.
d. Gemini, Taurus, and Leo should be processed further.
Ans: D, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Gemini - $15,000 - $10,000 - $2,500 = $2,500 increase (process further)
Taurus - $35,000 - $30,000 - $3,000 = $2,000 increase (process further)
Leo - $25,000 - $20,000 - $4,000 = $1,000 increase (process further)
Virgo - $45,000 - $40,000 - $6,000 = $1,000 decrease (sell as is)
final sales value – sales at split-off – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- Stars Unlimited produces four products through a joint process that incurs costs of $150,000. Information for these products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Sales Value at Final Further
Product Produced at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Gemini 3,000 $10,000 $15,000 $2,500
Taurus 5,000 30,000 35,000 3,000
Leo 4,000 20,000 25,000 4,000
Virgo 6,000 40,000 45,000 6,000
If Gemini is processed further, profits will
a. increase by $2,500.
b. decrease by $2,500.
c. increase by $12,500.
d. increase by $10,000.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $15,000 - $10,000 - $2,500 = $2,500 increase
final sales value – sales at split-off – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- Stars Unlimited produces four products through a joint process that incurs costs of $150,000. Information for these products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Sales Value at Final Further
Product Produced at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Gemini 3,000 $10,000 $15,000 $2,500
Taurus 5,000 30,000 35,000 3,000
Leo 4,000 20,000 25,000 4,000
Virgo 6,000 40,000 45,000 6,000
If Taurus is processed further, profits will
a. increase by $2,000.
b. decrease by $2,000.
c. increase by $32,000.
d. increase by $30,000.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $35,000 - $30,000 - $3,000 = $2,000 increase
final sales value – sales at split-off – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- Stars Unlimited produces four products through a joint process that incurs costs of $150,000. Information for these products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Sales Value at Final Further
Product Produced at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Gemini 3,000 $10,000 $15,000 $2,500
Taurus 5,000 30,000 35,000 3,000
Leo 4,000 20,000 25,000 4,000
Virgo 6,000 40,000 45,000 6,000
If Leo is processed further, profits will
a. increase by $1,000.
b. decrease by $1,000.
c. increase by $21,000.
d. increase by $20,000.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $25,000 - $20,000 - $4,000 = $1,000 increase
final sales value – sales at split-off – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- Stars Unlimited produces four products through a joint process that incurs costs of $150,000. Information for these products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Sales Value at Final Further
Product Produced at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Gemini 3,000 $10,000 $15,000 $2,500
Taurus 5,000 30,000 35,000 3,000
Leo 4,000 20,000 25,000 4,000
Virgo 6,000 40,000 45,000 6,000
If Virgo is processed further, profits will
a. increase by $1,000.
b. decrease by $1,000.
c. increase by $39,000.
d. increase by $40,000.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $45,000 - $40,000 - $6,000 = $1,000 decrease
final sales value – sales at split-off – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
Which, if any, products should be processed further?
a. Berry Delight only.
b. Berry Delight and Chocolate Wonder.
c. Caramel Chip only.
d. Berry Delight and Caramel Chip.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Berry Delight – ($10 - $8) x 63,000 - $88,000 = $38,000 increase (process further)
Chocolate Wonder – ($10.50 - $10) x 113,000 - $43,000 = $13,500 increase (process further)
Caramel Chip – ($5.60 – 5) x 38,000 - $33,000 = $10,200 decrease (sell as is)
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
The net increase or decrease in profits of processing all the treats further is
a. an increase of $41,300.
b. a decrease of $41,300.
c. an increase of $21,700.
d. a decrease of $21,700.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Berry Delight – ($10 - $8) x 63,000 - $88,000 = $38,000 increase
Chocolate Wonder – ($10.50 - $10) x 113,000 - $43,000 = $13,500 increase
Caramel Chip – ($5.60 – 5) x 38,000 - $33,000 = $10,200 decrease
$38,000 + $13,500 - $10,200 = $41,300 increase
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
Berry delight increase + chocolate wonder increase – caramel chip decrease = net increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
Assuming the company correctly identifies which product(s) to process further, what will be the company’s increase in profits by further processing the identified product(s)?
a. $41,300.
b. $51,500.
c. $19,453.
d. $39,220.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Berry Delight – ($10 - $8) x 63,000 - $88,000 = $38,000 increase
Chocolate Wonder – ($10.50 - $10) x 113,000 - $43,000 = $13,500 increase
$38,000 + $13,500 = $51,500 increase
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
Berry delight increase + chocolate wonder increase = net increase
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
The net increase or decrease in profits of processing Berry Delight further is
a. an increase of $38,000.
b. a decrease of $38,000.
c. an increase of $19,453.
d. a decrease of $19,453.
Ans: A, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Berry Delight – ($10 - $8) x 63,000 - $88,000 = $38,000 increase
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
The net increase or decrease in profits of processing Chocolate Wonder further is
a. an increase of $19,766.
b. a decrease of $19,766.
c. an increase of $13,500.
d. a decrease of $13,500.
Ans: C, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Chocolate Wonder – ($10.50 - $10) x 113,000 - $43,000 = $13,500 increase
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
The net increase or decrease in profits of processing Caramel Chip further is
a. an increase of $21,387.
b. a decrease of $21,387.
c. an increase of $10,200.
d. a decrease of $10,200.
Ans: D, LO 3, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Caramel Chip – ($5.60 – 5) x 38,000 - $33,000 = $10,200 decrease
(final price per unit – price per unit at split-off) x lbs produced – further processing costs = increase (decrease)
- The Sweete Shoppe produces a variety of sweet treats. Several treats can be sold at split-off or further processed to produce a different type of treat. The following three treats are all produced in a joint processing operation at a cost of $63,000. The costs are allocated based on pounds produced. Information for these treats is as follows:
If Processed Further
Pounds (lb) Price per lb at Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
Berry Delight 63,000 $8.00 $10.00 $88,000
Chocolate Wonder 113,000 10.00 10.50 43,000
Caramel Chip 38,000 5.00 5.60 33,000
The joint processing costs for these treats
a. should be allocated to the treats to determine whether they should be sold at split-off or processed further.
b. should be ignored in determining whether they should be sold at split-off or processed further.
c. should be ignored in making all product decisions.
d. are never included in the product costs and can mislead management in the decision-making process.
Ans: B, LO 3, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- All the following statements are true regarding the allocation of joint costs except:
a. Joint costs are allocated to products to help managers effectively control their costs.
b. Joint costs are allocated to products to identify the total cost of production in producing various products.
c. Joint costs are allocated to products to be sure each manager is only responsible for their share of the costs.
d. Joint costs are allocated to products to help identify if the product should be processed further or sold as-is.
Ans: D, LO 3, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- When a company produces a by-product along with its primary product, as part of a joint process, the following method(s) may be used to account for the by-product transaction:
a. The production method only
b. The sales method only.
c. The production and sales methods, either method is sufficient.
d. The production and sales methods, in conjunction with one another.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- The production method of accounting for the costs of a by-product
a. treats the by-product as nonexistent until the by-product is sold.
b. recognizes only the NRV of the by-product.
c. recognizes by-products as soon as they are produced.
d. recognizes the by-product once it has been determined to be processed further.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- The sales method of accounting for the costs of a by-product
a. treats the by-product as nonexistent until the by-product is sold.
b. recognizes only the NRV of the by-product.
c. recognizes by-products as soon as they are produced.
d. recognizes the by-product once it has been determined to be processed further.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Using the production method to account for by-products, by-products are accounted for
a. in Work-in-Process Inventory (WIP) and then in Finished Good Inventory.
b. only in Work-in-Process Inventory (WIP).
c. only in Finished Good Inventory.
d. are only expensed to Cost of Goods Sold.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Using the production method to account for by-products, joint costs
a. are allocated to the by-products along with the primary joint products.
b. are not allocated to the by-products.
c. are allocated to the by-product based on its NRV.
d. are only expensed to Cost of Goods Sold.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: K, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in joint costs should be allocated to the by-product, using the production method?
a. $2,000.
b. $1,604.
c. $0.
d. $2,250.
Ans: D, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 2,250 lbs x $1 = $2,250 (NRV)
Coconut skin units produced in tons x Coconut skin sales per lb = NRV
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
The correct journal entry to transfer the joint production costs from WIP to FG, using the production method is
- FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,465
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 53,931
FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 1,604
WIP Inventory 75,000
- FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,294
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 53,456
FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 2,250
WIP Inventory 75,000
c. FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 2,250
WIP Inventory 2,250
d. FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,890
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 55,110
WIP Inventory 75,000
Ans: B, LO 4, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 2,250 lbs x $1 = $2,250 (NRV)
$75,000 - $2,250 = $72,750 (remaining joint costs)
Coconut milk – 21,000 x 1.30 = $27,300 (sales value at split off)
Coconut meat – 12,200 x 6.20 = $75,640 (sales value at split off)
$27,300 + $75,640 = $102,940 (total sales value at split off of primary products)
$27,300 ÷ $102,940 x $72,750 = $19,294
$75,640 ÷ $102,940 x $72,750 = $53,456
lbs of coconut skin x coconut skin sales price per unit = NRV of coconut skin
Total joint costs – NRV of coconut skin = remaining joint costs
Coconut milk – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut milk sales value at split off
Coconut meat – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut meat sales value at split off
coconut milk sales value at split off + coconut meat sales value at split off = total sales value at split off of primary products
coconut milk sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x remaining joint costs = coconut milk allocated joint costs
coconut meat sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x remaining joint costs = coconut meat allocated joint costs
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in total sales would be recorded for the products sold under the production method?
a. $89,210.
b. $91,210.
c. $102,940.
d. $105,190.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: (19,500 x $1.30) + (10,300 x $6.20) = $89,210
(Coconut milk units sold x Coconut milk sales price per lb) + (Coconut meat units sold x Coconut meat sales price per lb)
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in total cost of goods sold would be recorded for the products sold under the production method?
a. $89,210.
b. $64,996.
c. $65,297.
d. $63,047.
Ans: D, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: 2,250 lbs x $1 = $2,250 (NRV)
$75,000 - $2,250 = $72,750 (remaining joint costs)
Coconut milk – 21,000 x 1.30 = $27,300 (sales value at split off)
Coconut meat – 12,200 x 6.20 = $75,640 (sales value at split off)
$27,300 + $75,640 = $102,940 (total sales value at split off of primary products)
$27,300 ÷ $102,940 x $72,750 = $19,294 (Coconut Milk - allocated joint costs)
$75,640 ÷ $102,940 x $72,750 = $53,456(Coconut Meat - allocated joint costs)
$19,294 ÷ 21,000 x 19,500 = $17,915 (Coconut Milk - cogs)
$53,456 ÷ 12,200 x 10,300 = $45,131(Coconut Meat - cogs)
$17,915 + $45,131 = $63,047 (total cogs)
lbs of coconut skin x coconut skin sales price per unit = NRV of coconut skin
Total joint costs – NRV of coconut skin = remaining joint costs
Coconut milk – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut milk sales value at split off
Coconut meat – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut meat sales value at split off
coconut milk sales value at split off + coconut meat sales value at split off = total sales value at split off of primary products
coconut milk sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x remaining joint costs = coconut milk allocated joint costs
coconut meat sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x remaining joint costs = coconut meat allocated joint costs
Coconut Milk - allocated joint costs ÷ coconut milk units produced x coconut milk units sold = coconut milk cogs
Coconut Meat- allocated joint costs ÷ coconut meat units produced x coconut meat units sold = coconut meat cogs
coconut milk cogs + coconut meat cogs = total cogs
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in sales and cost of goods sold will be assigned to the Coconut Skin, respectively, using the production method?
a. $0, $0.
b. $2,000, $2,250.
c. $2,250, $2,000.
d. $2,000, $0.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $0, $0 – by-products are not assigned to sales or COGS
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
The journal entry to sell the coconut milk, using the production method, will include a credit to
a. Cash or Accounts receivable.
b. WIP - Inventory.
c. FG - Inventory.
d. Sales.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- The income statement is ____________ impacted by the sale of a by-product, using the production method.
a. positively.
b. negatively.
c. not.
d. substantially.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Using the production method, scrap is
a. transferred from finished goods to cost of goods sold.
b. expensed as incurred.
c. treated in the same manner as the by-product.
d. treated in the same manner as the primary product.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in joint costs should be allocated to the by-product, using the sales method?
a. $2,000.
b. $1,604.
c. $0.
d. $2,250.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: $0, all joint costs are allocated to the primary products
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
The correct journal entry to transfer the joint production costs from WIP to FG, using the sales method is
- FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,465
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 53,931
FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 1,604
WIP Inventory 75,000
- FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,294
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 53,456
FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 2,250
WIP Inventory 75,000
c. FG Inventory – Coconut Skin 2,250
WIP Inventory 2,250
d. FG Inventory – Coconut Milk 19,890
FG Inventory – Coconut Meat 55,110
WIP Inventory 75,000
Ans: D, LO 4, Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Coconut milk – 21,000 x 1.30 = $27,300 (sales value at split off)
Coconut meat – 12,200 x 6.20 = $75,640 (sales value at split off)
$27,300 + $75,640 = $102,940 (total sales value at split off of primary products)
$27,300 ÷ $102,940 x $75,000 = $19,890
$75,640 ÷ $102,940 x $75,000 = $55,110
Coconut milk – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut milk sales value at split-off
Coconut meat – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut meat sales value at split-off
coconut milk sales value at split-off + coconut meat sales value at split off = total sales value at split off of primary products
coconut milk sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x joint costs = coconut milk allocated joint costs
coconut meat sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x joint costs = coconut meat allocated joint costs
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in total sales would be recorded for the products sold under the sales method?
a. $89,210.
b. $91,210.
c. $102,940.
d. $105,190.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: (19,500 x $1.30) + (10,300 x $6.20) = $89,210
(Coconut milk units sold x Coconut milk sales price per lb) + (Coconut meat units sold x Coconut meat sales price per lb)
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in total cost of goods sold would be recorded for the products sold, under the sales method?
a. $89,210.
b. $64,996.
c. $65,297.
d. $63,047.
Ans: B, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Coconut milk – 21,000 x 1.30 = $27,300 (sales value at split off)
Coconut meat – 12,200 x 6.20 = $75,640 (sales value at split off)
$27,300 + $75,640 = $102,940 (total sales value at split off of primary products)
$27,300 ÷ $102,940 x $75,000 = $19,890 (Coconut Milk - allocated joint costs)
$75,640 ÷ $102,940 x $75,000 = $55,110 (Coconut Meat - allocated joint costs)
$19,890 ÷ 21,000 x 19,500 = $18,469 (Coconut Milk - cogs)
$55,110 ÷ 12,200 x 10,300 = $46,527(Coconut Meat - cogs)
$18,469 + $46,527 = $64,996 (total cogs)
Coconut milk – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut milk sales value at split off
Coconut meat – units produced x sales price per unit = coconut meat sales value at split off
coconut milk sales value at split off + coconut meat sales value at split off = total sales value at split off of primary products
coconut milk sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x joint costs = coconut milk allocated joint costs
coconut meat sales value at split off ÷ total sales value at split off of primary products x joint costs = coconut meat allocated joint costs
Coconut Milk - allocated joint costs ÷ coconut milk units produced x coconut milk units sold = coconut milk cogs
Coconut Meat- allocated joint costs ÷ coconut meat units produced x coconut meat units sold = coconut meat cogs
coconut milk cogs + coconut meat cogs = total cogs
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
How much in sales and cost of goods sold will be assigned to the Coconut Skin, respectively, using the sales method?
a. $0, $0.
b. $2,000, $2,250.
c. $2,250, $0.
d. $2,000, $0.
Ans: D, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
Solution: Sales – 2,000 X $1.00 = $2,000, $0 – by-products are not assigned to sales or COGS
Lbs sold x price per lb
- Coconuts N More produces two joint products, Coconut Milk and Coconut Meat. The company uses the leftover Coconut Skin as a by-product. All three are produced from joint costs of $75,000: direct materials amounting to $50,000 and another $25,000 for direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Beginning inventory for all three products is zero. Information for production of the product is as follows:
Units Produced Units Sold Sales price
Product in lbs in lbs per lb
Coconut Milk 21,000 19,500 $1.30
Coconut Meat 12,200 10,300 6.20
Coconut Skin 2,250 2,000 1.00
The journal entry to sell the coconut milk, using the sales method, will include a credit to
a. Cash or Accounts receivable.
b. WIP - Inventory.
c. FG - Inventory.
d. Sales.
Ans: D, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- The income statement is ____________ impacted by the sale of a by-product, using the sales method.
a. positively.
b. negatively.
c. not.
d. substantially.
Ans: A, LO 4, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Using the sales method, scrap is
a. transferred from finished goods to cost of goods sold.
b. expensed as incurred.
c. treated in the same manner as the by-product.
d. treated in the same manner as the primary product.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
- Which of the following statements is true, in regard to the production method versus the sales method?
a. The sales method is preferred because it recognizes the sale of the by-product and scrap at the point of sale.
b. The production method is preferred because it recognizes the sale of the by-product and scrap at the point of production.
c. Either method can be chosen because the overall effect of the by-product and scrap transactions should be incidental to a company’s primary business.
d. Either method can be chosen because the overall effect of the by-product and scrap transactions is material to the decision-making process.
Ans: C, LO 4, Bloom: C, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: None, AICPA: FN, Decision Modeling IMA: Cost Management
SHORT ANSWER
106. A joint process is used to turn milk into butter, cream, and cheese. The cream is further processed into heaving whipping cream and half & half. The butter and cheese are sold as-is. In addition to these products, buttermilk is also produced as an unintended output. What name(s) would you call these products? Describe the difference between these types of products.
Ans: N/A, LO 1, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Easy, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Butter, cream, and cheese would be the joint products.
Butter, heavy whipping cream, half & half, and cheese would be considered the final products.
Buttermilk is considered a by-product.
Joint products are the primary products and can be sold or processed further to become final products. These products are the reason a company is in business and are considered the main component of sales revenue.
By-products are the unintended output of creating the primary products but still have a future use or economic value. These products can be sold, but the sale of them is usually not material to the income statement.
107. There are three methods of allocating joint costs. List each method and discuss when the allocation methods should be chosen.
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Sales Value at Split-Off Method. Allocates joint costs using the future sales value of the process’s total production of joint products and the relative proportion of each product’s sales value to the total. This method should be selected when the sales prices at the split-off point are available and reliable.
Net Realizable Value (NRV) Method. The NRV method allocates joint costs based on the product’s share of the total NRV. NRV is calculated by taking the final sales value less further processing costs. The NRV method should be chosen when the sales price at the split-off point is unavailable or unreliable, but the NRV information is available and reliable.
Physical Quantities Method. This method allocates joint costs based on the product’s share of a reasonable measurement basis for the joint products. For example, it could be based on volume, weight, length, or height. This method should only be used if the sales prices at the split-off point and the NRV information are unavailable or unreliable.
108. Dairy Cream Company uses a joint process to create heavy cream and light cream. When first produced, there was no market for the two products, so both were processed further into final products. However, the company has now realized there is a market for both the heavy and light cream immediately after they are produced. What information should Dairy Cream consider when deciding whether to sell the products as is or continue to process them further?
Ans: N/A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Dairy Cream Company should consider the NRV (Sales value of final product less further processing costs) and the sales value at split-off. If the sales value at split-off is greater than the NRV, the product should be sold as-is. Otherwise, the products should be processed further.
Each product should be separately analyzed. The company should also be sure they have adequate capacity and capability, there is sufficient demand for the product(s), and the decision will maximize its profits.
109. NE Crossing Company produces two main products and a by-product during a joint process. The company uses the sales method to account for by-products, and the sales value at the split-off method is used to assign joint costs to the joint products. Describe the process of assigning joint costs and what happens when the product is sold.
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
When a company uses the sales method to account for by-products, joint costs are not assigned to the by-product, and all costs are assigned to the two main products. When the by-product is later sold, the company will record the sale by debiting cash and crediting Sales. As a result, there will be no cost recognized on the by-product, and the sale of the product will not affect inventory.
110. NE Crossing Company produces two main products and a by-product during a joint process. The company uses the production method to account for by-products, and the sales value at the split-off method is used to assign joint costs to the joint products. Describe the process of assigning joint costs and what happens when the product is sold.
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
When a company uses the production method to account for by-products, joint costs are assigned to the by-product equal to its net realizable value (NRV.) If there are no further processing costs, the by-product’s NRV will equal its sales value at split-off. When the by-product is later sold, the company will record the sale by debiting cash and crediting Finished Goods Inventory – By-Product. There will be no gross margin recognized on the by-product, and the sale of the product will not affect the income statement.
BRIEF EXERCISES
111. Menkes Production Company manufactures two products from a joint process. The joint process costs $20,000. Both products must be processed past the split-off point to be marketable. White sugar produces 500 units or 20,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $5 per unit, and has a market price of $25. Brown sugar produces 2,000 units or 50,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $10 per unit, and has a market price of $20.
Using the physical quantities method to allocate joint costs, how much joint costs will be allocated to each product? (round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
White Sugar = $5,714
Brown Sugar = $14,286
Solution:
20,000 + 50,000 = 70,000 total lbs
White Sugar = 20,000 ÷ 70,000 x $20,000 = $5,714
Brown Sugar = 50,000 ÷ 70,000 x $20,000 = $14,286
112. Menkes Production Company manufactures two products from a joint process. The joint process costs $20,000. Both products must be processed past the split-off point to be marketable. White sugar produces 500 units or 20,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $5 per unit, and has a market price of $25. Brown sugar produces 2,000 units or 50,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $10 per unit, and has a market price of $20.
Using the sales value at split-off method to allocate joint costs, how much joint costs will be allocated to each product? (round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
White Sugar = $4,762
Brown Sugar = $15,238
Solution:
White Sugar total Sales = 500 x $25 = $12,500
Brown Sugar Total Sales = 2,000 x $20 = $40,000
Total Sales = $12,500 + $40,000 = $52,500
White Sugar = $12,500 ÷ $52,500 x $20,000 = $4,762
Brown Sugar = $40,000 ÷ $52,500 x $20,000 = $15,238
113. Menkes Production Company manufactures two products from a joint process. The joint process costs $20,000. Both products must be processed past the split-off point to be marketable. White sugar produces 500 units or 20,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $5 per unit, and has a market price of $25. Brown sugar produces 2,000 units or 50,000 lbs., incurs separable costs of $10 per unit, and has a market price of $20.
Using the NRV method to allocate joint costs, how much joint costs will be allocated to each product? (round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
White Sugar = $6,667
Brown Sugar = $13,333
Solution:
White Sugar NRV = 500 x ($25 - $5) = $10,000
Brown Sugar NRV = 2,000 x ($20 - $10) = $20,000
Total NRV = $10,000 + $20,000 = $30,000
White Sugar = $10,000 ÷ $30,000 x $20,000 = $6,667
Brown Sugar = $20,000 ÷ $30,000 x $20,000 = $13,333
114. Dolls R Us produces four different dolls that use a joint process. Each product may be sold at split-off or processed further. Joint processing costs for the products are $200,000. Other relevant information for the dolls is as follows:
If Processed Further
Sales Value Final Further
Product at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Cry Baby $40,000 $70,000 $24,000
Diaper Baby 16,000 20,000 10,000
Feeding Baby 20,000 48,000 10,000
Take Along Baby 24,000 36,000 16,000
Suppose joint costs are allocated based on the sales value at split-off, which products should be processed further. Show all calculations.
Ans: N/A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Cry Baby and Feeding Baby should be processed further as processing both products further will increase overall profits by $24,000.
Solution:
Cry Baby = $70,000 - $24,000 - $40,000 = $6,000
Diaper Baby – $20,000 - $10,000 - $16,000 = -$6,000
Feeding Baby – $48,000 - $10,000 - $20,000 = $18,000
Take Along Baby – $36,000 - $16,000 - $24,000 = -$4,000
Total increase for Cry Baby and Feeding Baby = $6,000 + $18,000 = $24,000
115.Dolls R Us produces four different dolls that use a joint process. Each product may be sold at split-off or processed further. Joint processing costs for the products are $200,000. Other relevant information for the dolls is as follows:
If Processed Further
Sales Value Final Further
Product at Split-Off Sales Value Processing Costs
Cry Baby $40,000 $70,000 $24,000
Diaper Baby 16,000 20,000 10,000
Feeding Baby 20,000 48,000 10,000
Take Along Baby 24,000 36,000 16,000
If joint costs are allocated based on the sales value at split-off, determine how processing each product further will affect profits.
Ans: N/A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Cry Baby – increase $6,000
Diaper Baby – Decrease $6,000
Feeding Baby – Increase $18,000
Take Along Baby – Decrease $4,000
Total overall affect = Increase $14,000
Solution:
Cry Baby = $70,000 - $24,000 - $40,000 = $6,000
Diaper Baby – $20,000 - $10,000 - $16,000 = -$6,000
Feeding Baby – $48,000 - $10,000 - $20,000 = $18,000
Take Along Baby – $36,000 - $16,000 - $24,000 = -$4,000
Total overall affect = $6,000 - $6,000 + $18,000 - $4,000 = $14,000
116.Whitehead Corporation manufactures three different tires that use the same joint process. Each tire can be sold as is or processed further to create an upgraded tire. The joint process costs $30,000. Information for the three products is as follows:
If Processed Further
Units Price per unit Final price Further
Product Produced at Split-Off per unit Processing Costs
P225/70R 5,600 $70 $80 $15
P265/65R 10,000 $90 $120 $20
P275/65R 2,500 $120 $145 $22
If joint costs are allocated based on the NRV, which tire, or tires, should be processed further and which ones should be sold at split-off. Show all supporting calculations. (round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
P265/65R & P275/65R should be processed further.
P265/65R – increase of profit of $100,000 or $10 per unit
P275/65R – an increase of profit of $7,500 or $3 per unit
Solution:
P225/70R = (($80 - $15) - $70) = -$5 x 5,600 = -$28,000
P265/65R = (($120 - $20) - $90) = $10 x 10,000 = $100,000
P275/65R = (($145 - $22) - $120) = $3 x 2,500 = $7,500
117. Lana can process both of her products using a joint process. She can further process both products beyond split-off and increase her profits by $9,000 beyond what she can sell them for at split-off. The final sales value of these products after further processing is $42,000. If the products can be sold for $25,000 at split-off, how much additional processing costs would Lana have incurred to generate a higher final sales value?
Ans: N/A, LO 3, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
$8,000
Solution:
$42,000 - $25,000 - $9,000 = $8,000
118. Lastotal produces ice cream from his home. He creates two main products from a joint process, chocolate and vanilla, and one by-product, twists. The twists result from the excess liquid of both the chocolate and vanilla. The chocolate can be sold for $8,000, and the vanilla can be sold for $6,000. The twists will be sold for $900. If Lastotal uses the production method to account for by-products, how much of the joint process costs of $7,500 will be allocated to each product? (Round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Chocolate - $3,771
Vanilla - $2,829
Twists - $900
Solution:
$900 – allocated to Twists (NRV)
$7,500 - $900 = $6,600 to chocolate and vanilla
$8,000 + $6,000 = $14,000, total sales of main products
Chocolate, $8,000 ÷ $14,000 x $6,600 = $3,771
Vanilla, $6,000 ÷ $14,000 x $6,600 = $2,829
119. Lastotal produces ice cream from his home. He creates two main products from a joint process, chocolate and vanilla, and one by-product, twists. The twists result from the excess liquid of both the chocolate and vanilla. The chocolate can be sold for $8,000, and the vanilla can be sold for $6,000. The twists will be sold for $900. If Lastotal uses the sales method to account for by-products, how much of the joint process costs of $7,500 will be allocated to each product? (Round to the nearest whole dollar)
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Chocolate - $4,286
Vanilla - $3,214
Twists - $0
Solution:
Twists - $0
$8,000 + $6,000 = $14,000, total sales of main products
Chocolate, $8,000 ÷ $14,000 x $7,500 = $4,286
Vanilla, $6,000 ÷ $14,000 x $7,500 = $3,214
120. Kreider Farms produces three products and one by-product: Whole Wheat Flour, Bleached Flour, All-Purpose Flour, and Bran (by-product). Bran can be sold for $1,200. Joint process costs for the products are $12,200. If the other three products can be sold for $23,000, how much revenue will Kreider Farms record for the Bran if they use the sales method to account for by-products? How much revenue will they record if they use the production method to account for by-products?
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Sales Method - $24,200
Production Method - $23,000
Solution:
Sales Method – $23,000 + $1,200
Production Method – $23,000
121. Kreider Farms produces three products and one by-product: Whole Wheat Flour, Bleached Flour, All-Purpose Flour, and Bran (by-product). Bran can be sold for $1,200. Joint process costs for the products are $12,200. If the other three products can be sold for $23,000, prepare the journal entry for the sale of the Bran if the company uses the sales method to account for by-products? Prepare the journal entry for the sale of the Bran if the company uses the production method to account for by-products?
Ans: N/A, LO 4, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
Sales Method:
Cash $1,200
Sales – Bran $1,200
Production Method:
Cash $1,200
FG Inventory – Bran $1,200
EXERCISES
122. Gene started a business that retrieves golf balls from lakes and surrounding areas at the local greens. The recovered balls are cleaned and then assessed based on quality and priced to sell to the local sporting goods store. Birdie golf balls are sold for $5 per dozen, Bogey golf balls are sold at $4 a dozen, and Duffer golf balls are sold at $3 per dozen. Costs incurred last month amounted to $8,000 and produced (in dozens) 1,000 Birdie, 3,000 Bogey, and 2,000 Duffer. A dozen golf balls (no matter the quality) weigh 2lbs.
Instructions
a. If Gene uses the sales value at split-off method, how much in joint costs will be allocated to each product?
b. If Gene uses the physical quantities method, how much in joint costs will be allocated to each product?
c. Using the sales value at split-off method, how much will Gene recognize as gross profit for each product?
d. Using the physical quantities method, how much will Gene recognize as gross profit for each product?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Birdie - $1,739
Bogey - $4,174
Duffer - $2,087
b. Birdie - $1,333
Bogey - $4,000
Duffer - $2,667
c. Birdie - $3,261
Bogey - $7,826
Duffer - $3,913
d. Birdie - $3,667
Bogey - $8,000
Duffer - $3,333
Solution:
a.
Product | Sales Price Per Unit | Units Produced (in dozens) | Total Sales | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | |||||
Birdie | 5 | x | 1,000 | = | 5,000 | ÷ | 23,000 | x | 8,000 | 1,739 |
Bogey | 4 | x | 3,000 | = | 12,000 | ÷ | 23,000 | x | 8,000 | 4,174 |
Duffer | 3 | x | 2,000 | = | 6,000 | ÷ | 23,000 | x | 8,000 | 2,087 |
Total | 23,000 | $8,000 |
b.
Product | Units Produced (in dozens) | lb per dozen | Total Lbs | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | |||||
Birdie | 1,000 | x | 2 | = | 2,000 | ÷ | 12,000 | x | 8,000 | 1,333 |
Bogey | 3,000 | x | 2 | = | 6,000 | ÷ | 12,000 | x | 8,000 | 4,000 |
Duffer | 2,000 | x | 2 | = | 4,000 | ÷ | 12,000 | x | 8,000 | 2,667 |
Total | 12,000 | $8,000 |
c.
Birdie | Bogey | Duffer | |
Sales | 5,000 | 12,000 | 6,000 |
Costs | 1,739 | 4,174 | 2,087 |
Gross Margin | 3,261 | 7,826 | 3,913 |
d.
Birdie | Bogey | Duffer | |
Sales | 5,000 | 12,000 | 6,000 |
Costs | 1,333 | 4,000 | 2,667 |
Gross Margin | 3,667 | 8,000 | 3,333 |
123. Blender Corporation produces two products, cheese, and butter, in a single process. In the month of January, the joint costs related to the process amounted to $96,000. In addition, 5,000 pounds of cheese and 4,000 pounds of butter were produced. The sales value at the point of separation was $13 for cheese and $14 for butter. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were: cheese, $18,000; butter, $18,000. Cheese sells for $17 per pound; butter sells for $18 per pound.
Instructions
a. If Blender uses the sales-value at split-off method, how much in joint costs will be allocated to each product?
b. If Blender uses the NRV method, how much in joint costs will be allocated to each product?
c. Which method will be a better allocation for Blender Corporation if the sales value at split-off is reliable?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Measurement, Analysis, and Interpretation, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Cheese - $51,570
Butter - $44,430
b. Cheese - $53,157
Butter - $42,843
c. Because the sales value at split-off is reliable, it is the preferred method for Blender Corporation.
Solution:
a.
Product | Sales Price Per Unit | Lbs. Produced | Total Sales | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | |||||
Cheese | $13 | x | 5,000 | = | 65,000 | ÷ | 121,000 | x | 96,000 | 51,570 |
Butter | 14 | x | 4,000 | = | 56,000 | ÷ | 121,000 | x | 96,000 | 44,430 |
Total | 121,000 |
b.
Product | Market Price Per Unit | Lbs. Produced | Final Sales | Further Processing Cost | NRV | |||
Cheese | $17 | x | 5,000 | = | 85,000 | - | 18,000 | 67,000 |
Butter | 18 | x | 4,000 | = | 72,000 | - | 18,000 | 54,000 |
Total | ||||||||
Product | NRV | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | |||||
Cheese | 67,000 | ÷ | 121,000 | x | 96,000 | = | 53,157 | |
Butter | 54,000 | ÷ | 121,000 | x | 96,000 | = | 42,843 | |
Total | 121,000 |
124. Payton Company uses a joint process to produce two products. The production results in 500 units for Product I and 2,000 units for Product II. The joint process costs are $20,000. Both products must be processed past the split-off point, incurring separable costs of $5 per unit for Product I and $10 per unit for Product II. The market price is $25 and $20 per unit of Products I and II, respectively. Product I has a weight of 20oz per unit, and Product II weighs 25oz per unit.
Instructions
a. Allocate the joint costs to each product using the NRV method.
b. Allocate the joint costs to each product using the physical quantities method.
c. Calculate the difference in allocated costs between the two methods. Which method would you recommend and why?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Product I - $6,667
Product II - $13,333
b. Product I - $3,333
Product II - $16,667
c. Product I Difference $3,333
Product II Difference ($3,333)
If the NRV information is available and reliable, the NRV method should be used.
Solution:
a.
Product | Market Price Per Unit | Further Processing Cost per Unit | NRV per Unit | Units Produced | Total NRV | ||||
Product I | $25 | - | 5 | = | 20 | x | 500 | = | 10,000 |
Product II | 20 | - | 10 | = | 10 | x | 2,000 | = | 20,000 |
Product | Total NRV | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | ||||||
Product I | 10,000 | ÷ | 30,000 | x | 20,000 | = | 6,667 | ||
Product II | 20,000 | ÷ | 30,000 | x | 20,000 | = | 13,333 | ||
Total | 30,000 |
b.
Product | Units Produced | oz per unit | Total ozs | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | |||||||||||||||||||
Product I | 500 | x | 20 | = | 10,000 | ÷ | 60,000 | x | 20,000 | = | 3,333 | |||||||||||||
Product II | 2,000 | x | 25 | = | 50,000 | ÷ | 60,000 | x | 20,000 | = | 16,667 | |||||||||||||
Total | 60,000 |
c.
Product I | Product II | |
NRV Method | $6,667 | $13,333 |
Physical Quantities Method | 3,333 | 16,667 |
Difference | 3,333 | (3,333) |
125. Napa Productions produces Salsa and Spaghetti Sauce from fresh tomatoes grown in its local greenhouse. The process is a joint process that produces juice and then is separated and two identifiable products are created. The joint cost to produce the products is $90,000 and results in the following data:
Gallons Final
Product Produced Sales Value
Spaghetti Sauce 6,000 $130,000
Salsa 15,000 20,000
Instructions
a. Allocate the joint costs to each product using the NRV method.
b. Napa has identified a new marketable product by further processing the salsa. With an additional cost of $4,000, he can modify the salsa to create different spices. The gallons produced will not change, and the final sales value of the new product will be 26,000. Given this new information, reallocate the joint costs to each product using the NRV method.
c. Based on your calculations in part a, if Napa could sell the juice as is without processing it further into Spaghetti Sauce and Salsa with a marketable value of $$135,000, would you recommend the juice be sold as is or processed further?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, 3 Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Spaghetti Sauce - $78,000
Salsa - $12,000
b. Spaghetti Sauce - $76,974
Salsa - $13,026
c. Yes, Napa should process the juice into spaghetti sauce and Salsa because it will increase profits by $15,000.
Solution:
a.
Product | Final Sales Value | Further Processing Cost per Unit | Total NRV | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | ||||||
Spaghetti Sauce | 130,000 | - | - | = | 130,000 | ÷ | 150,000 | x | 90,000 | = | 78,000 |
Salsa | 20,000 | - | - | = | 20,000 | ÷ | 150,000 | x | 90,000 | = | 12,000 |
Total | 150,000 |
b.
Product | Final Sales Value | Further Processing Cost per Unit | Total NRV | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | ||||||
Spaghetti Sauce | 130,000 | - | - | = | 130,000 | ÷ | 152,000 | x | 90,000 | = | 76,974 |
Salsa | 26,000 | - | 4,000 | = | 22,000 | ÷ | 152,000 | x | 90,000 | = | 13,026 |
Total | 152,000 |
c.
Total NRV (from part a) $150,000
Total Value before processing 135,000
Profit change 15,000
126. Concrete Mixtures created cement lawn ornaments for its customers. The joint process costs $165,000 and creates two identifiable products, XS and M. The company has determined M can be sold as-is or processed further into product XL for an additional cost of $325,000. Information for the products is:
Product XS Quantity 25,000 cubic yards
Product M Quantity 45,000 cubic yards
Product XL Quantity 80,000 cubic yards
XS Sales value at split-off $3 per cubic yard
M Sales value at split-off $5 per cubic yard
XL Final sales value $9 per cubic yard
Instructions
a. Allocate the joint costs to each product using the sales value at split-off method, assuming XS and M are sold as-is with no further processing.
b. Calculate the gross margin for products XS and M, assuming they are sold at split-off, and the sales value at split-off method is used to allocate joint costs.
c. If product M is further processed into Product XL, allocate the joint costs using the NRV method and calculate the gross margin for Product XL.
d. Should Product M be further processed into Product XL? Report the profit increase or decrease if Product M is processed further.
Ans: N/A, LO 2, 3 Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Product XS $41,250
Product M $123,750
b. Product XS $33,750
Product M $101,250
c. Joint Costs Gross Margin
Product XS $26,330 $48,670
Product M $138,670 $256,330
d. Yes, overall profits will increase by $170,000
Solution:
a.
Product | Price Per Cubic Yard | Cubic Yards | Sales at Split-off | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | ||||||
XS | 3 | x | 25,000 | = | 75,000 | ÷ | 300,000 | x | 165,000 | = | 41,250 |
M | 5 | x | 45,000 | = | 225,000 | ÷ | 300,000 | x | 165,000 | = | 123,750 |
Total | 300,000 |
b.
Product XS | Product M | ||
Sales | 75,000 | 225,000 | |
Costs | 41,250 | 123,750 | |
Gross Margin | 33,750 | 101,250 |
c.
Product | Price Per Cubic Yard | Cubic Yards | Sales Value | Further Processing Cost | NRV | ||||
XS | 3 | x | 25,000 | = | 75,000 | - | 0 | = | 75,000 |
XL | 9 | x | 80,000 | = | 720,000 | - | 325,000 | = | 395,000 |
Total | |||||||||
Product | NRV | Joint Costs | Allocated Costs | ||||||
XS | 75,000 | ÷ | 470,000 | x | 165,000 | = | 26,330 | ||
XL | 395,000 | ÷ | 470,000 | x | 165,000 | = | 138,670 | ||
Total | 470,000 |
Product XS | Product XL | |||
Sales | 75,000 | 395,000 | ||
Costs | 26,330 | 138,670 | ||
Gross Margin | 48,670 | 256,330 |
d.
Product XL NRV $395,000
Product M sales value 225,000
Difference $170,000
127. Creekside Winery produces three types of wine, Dry, Sweet, and Fruity, using a joint process costing $150,000. The company uses the NRV method to allocate joint costs. Each type of wine can be sold as is or processed further. The information on the products is as follows:
Sales Value Additional Sales Value of
Product at Split-off Processing Costs Final Product
Dry $140,000 $22,000 $170,000
Sweet 116,000 13,000 120,000
Fruity 124,000 16,000 136,000
Instructions
a. If Creekside does not process any of the products further, what will the company report for a total gross margin?
b. If Creekside processes all the wines further, what will the company report for a total gross margin?
c. Which wine or wines should the company process further? Support your conclusion with calculations.
d. If the company proceeds with your recommendation in part c, what will the company report for a total gross margin?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, 3 Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. $230,000
b. $225,000
c. Only Dry should be processed further. It will increase profits by $8,000. The sweet and fruity wines will decrease profits by $9,000 and $4,000, respectively.
d. $238,000
Solution:
a.
Allocated | ||||||||||||
Product | NRV | Costs | ||||||||||
Dry | 140,000 | ÷ | 380,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 55,263 | |||||
Sweet | 116,000 | ÷ | 380,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 45,789 | |||||
Fruity | 124,000 | ÷ | 380,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 48,947 | |||||
380,000 |
Dry | Sweet | Fruity | Total | |
Sales | 140,000 | 116,000 | 124,000 | 380,000 |
Cost | 55,263 | 45,789 | 48,947 | 150,000 |
Gross Margin | 84,737 | 70,211 | 75,053 | 230,000 |
b.
Sales Value of | Additional | Allocated | |||||||||
Product | Final Product | Processing Costs | NRV | Costs | |||||||
Dry | 170,000 | - | 22,000 | = | 148,000 | ÷ | 375,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 59,200 |
Sweet | 120,000 | - | 13,000 | = | 107,000 | ÷ | 375,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 42,800 |
Fruity | 136,000 | - | 16,000 | = | 120,000 | ÷ | 375,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 48,000 |
375,000 |
Dry | Sweet | Fruity | Total | |
Sales | 170,000 | 120,000 | 136,000 | 426,000 |
Cost | 81,200 | 55,800 | 64,000 | 201,000 |
Gross Margin | 88,800 | 64,200 | 72,000 | 225,000 |
c.
Sales Value of | Sales Value | Additional | Inc (Dec) | ||||
Product | Final Product | at Split-off | Processing Costs | In Profits | |||
Dry | 170,000 | - | 140,000 | - | 22,000 | = | 8,000 |
Sweet | 120,000 | - | 116,000 | - | 13,000 | = | (9,000) |
Fruity | 136,000 | - | 124,000 | - | 16,000 | = | (4,000) |
d.
Sales Value | Additional | Allocated | |||||||||
Product | of Final Product | Processing Costs | NRV | Costs | |||||||
Dry | 170,000 | - | 22,000 | = | 148,000 | ÷ | 388,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 57,216 |
Sweet | 116,000 | - | = | 116,000 | ÷ | 388,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 44,845 | |
Fruity | 124,000 | - | = | 124,000 | ÷ | 388,000 | x | 150,000 | = | 47,938 | |
388,000 |
Dry | Sweet | Fruity | Total | |
Sales | 170,000 | 116,000 | 124,000 | 410,000 |
Cost | 79,216 | 44,845 | 47,938 | 172,000 |
Gross Margin | 90,784 | 71,155 | 76,062 | 238,000 |
128. Carpets N More produces carpet for commercial use. In the process of creating the carpet and sizing it for its customers, a by-product is created. These scraps are sold to other companies to be used in small projects such as dog houses or decorative designs. The revenue of these scraps is minimal compared to the overall sales of the company. The joint process to create both products is $65,000. The carpet produces 16,000 yards at $15 per yard. The scraps produce 3,000 yards and are sold at $1 per yard. Both products are sold at split-off and not processed further.
Instructions
- If the companies use the production method to account for the by-product, record the journal entries for the following transactions:
- The completion of all products. (carpet and scrap)
- The sale of the carpet, assuming all yards produced were sold.
- The sale of the scraps, assuming all yards produced were sold.
b. Repeat the steps of part a, if the company accounts for by-products using the sales method.
c. If 15% of the production for both products is unsold at year-end, how much inventory cost would remain on the balance sheet under the (1) production method, (2) sales method?
Ans: N/A, LO 4 Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a.
1. FG Inventory – Carpet (65,000 – 3,000) $62,000
FG Inventory – Scraps (3,000 x $1) 3,000
WIP Inventory $65,000
2. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) (16,000 x 15) 240,000
Sales - Carpet 240,000
Cost of Goods Sold 62,000
FG Inventory – Carpet 62,000
3. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 3,000
FG Inventory – Scraps 3,000
b.
1. FG Inventory – Carpet $65,000
WIP Inventory $65,000
2. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) (16,000 x 15) 240,000
Sales - Carpet 240,000
Cost of Goods Sold 65,000
FG Inventory – Carpet 65,000
3. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) (3,000 x $1) 3,000
Sales - Scraps 3,000
c. Production Method - $9,750
Sale Method $9,750
Solution:
c.
Ending Inventory in Units:
Carpet, 16,000 Yards x 15% = 2,400 yards
Scraps, 3,000 yards x 15% = 450 yards
Production Method
Allocated | Units | Units | Value in | ||||
Product | Costs | Produced | Remaining | Ending Inventory | |||
Carpet | 62,000 | ÷ | 16,000 | x | 2,400 | = | 9,300 |
Scraps | 3,000 | ÷ | 3,000 | x | 450 | = | 450 |
9,750 |
Sales Method
Allocated | Units | Units | Value in | ||||
Product | Costs | Produced | Remaining | Ending Inventory | |||
Carpet | 65,000 | ÷ | 16,000 | x | 2,400 | = | 9,750 |
129. Honey Bees produces pure honey and distributes it in 8 oz bottles. While harvesting and packaging the honey, pollen is collected and sold to another distributor that uses it to make Bee Bread. The honey is sold for $7 per bottle, and the pollen is sold for $1.50 per pound. Honey Bees produced 20,000 lbs of honey and 2,000 lbs of pollen.
Instructions
a. Assuming Honey Bees uses the production method to account for by-products, record the journal entry to record the sale of the pollen.
b. Assuming Honey Bees uses the sales method to account for by-products, record the journal entry to record the sale of the pollen.
c. Explain how the by-product benefits the company’s income in each of the above methods.
Ans: N/A, LO 4 Bloom: AP, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a.
Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 3,000
FG Inventory – Pollen (2,000 x $1.50) 3,000
b.
Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 3,000
Sales - Pollen 3,000
c. Under the production method, the effect comes through a lower COGS and higher total gross margin for the main product. Using the sales method, the benefit is higher sales and a higher gross margin. Both methods will have the same effect on net income if all by-products that are produced are sold in the same period.
Problems
130. Wooly Productions is a cotton mill that produces a variety of products. The Yarn and Fibers are produced using a joint process that costs $80,000. Lint is also produced as part of the joint process but is produced in a small quantity and not part of the general sale of the company but more of an after-thought with a marketable value. The Yarn and Fibers can be produced further into Woven Fabric and Tight-Knitted Fabric. The cost to process these further is 120,000 (Yarn to Woven Fabric) and 140,000 (Fibers to Tight-Knitted Fabric). Wooly has identified a market for all the products they produce but determined that the Yarn and Fibers would be processed further as the income appears to be greater.
You have been asked to run some analysis and prepare some journal entries to assist Wooly in achieving the highest net income based on the products it produces. The following information has been provided to assist with your analysis.
Pounds Pounds Sales Value
Product Produced Sold Per Pound
Yarn 20,000 $ 4
Fibers 60,000 6
Woven Fabric 24,000 24,000 8
Tight-Knitted Fabric 66,000 60,000 10
Lint 5,000 5,000 2
Instructions
- Wooly uses the NRV to allocate joint costs and the production method to account for by-products.
1. Allocate the joint costs to each product.
2. Calculate the gross margin for each product.
3. Prepare the journal entry to record the completion of the products.
4. Prepare the journal entry to record the sale of the primary products.
5. Prepare the journal entry to record the sale of the by-product.
- Wooly uses the NRV to allocate joint costs and the sales method to account for by-products.
1. Allocate the joint costs to each product.
2. Calculate the gross margin for each product.
3. Prepare the journal entry to record the completion of the products.
4. Prepare the journal entry to record the sale of the primary products.
5. Prepare the journal entry to record the sale of the by-product.
c. Since not all the Tight-Knitted Fabric produced was sold, calculate the ending inventory of the Finished Goods Inventory account.
1. using the production method to account for by-products.
2. using the sales method to account for by-products
d. Is Wooly making a good decision to process both products further? (Assume all Yarn and Fibers produced could also be sold) Support your answer with calculations.
Ans: N/A, LO 1, 2, 3, 4 Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Hard, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a.
1. Woven Fabric $8,514
Tight-Knitted Fabric $61,486
Lint $10,000
2. Woven Fabric $63,486
Tight-Knitted Fabric $416,830
Lint $0
3. FG Inventory – Woven Fabric (8,514 + 120,000) $128,514
FG Inventory – Tight-Knitted Fabric (61,486 + 140,000) 201,486
FG Inventory – Lint 10,000
WIP Inventory $340,000
4. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 792,000
Sales - Woven Fabric 192,000
Sales - Tight-Knitted Fabric (60,000 X $10) 600,000
Cost of Goods Sold 311,684
FG Inventory – Woven Fabric 128,514
FG Inventory - Tight-Knitted Fabric 183,170
5. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 10,000
FG Inventory – Lint 10,000
b.
1. Woven Fabric $9,730
Tight-Knitted Fabric $70,270
2. Woven Fabric $62,270
Tight-Knitted Fabric $408,845
Lint $10,000
3. FG Inventory – Woven Fabric (9,730 + 120,000) $129,730
FG Inventory – Tight-Knitted Fabric (70,270 + 140,000) 210,270
WIP Inventory $340,000
4. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 792,000
Sales - Woven Fabric 192,000
Sales - Tight-Knitted Fabric 600,000
Cost of Goods Sold 320,885
FG Inventory – Woven Fabric 129,730
FG Inventory - Tight-Knitted Fabric 191,155
5. Cash (or Accounts Receivable) 10,000
Sales – Lint 10,000
c. Production method - $18,316
Sales Method - $19,115
d. No, the Yarn should not be further into Woven Fabric. It is decreasing profits by $8,000. The Fibers should be further processed into Tight-Knitted Fabric. It is increasing profits by $160,000.
Solution:
a. Lint Sales = 5,000 x $2 = $10,000
Joint Costs | $ 80,000 |
Less: Lint Sales | 10,000 |
70,000 |
(Costs allocated to Lint)
(Costs to allocate to Primary products)
1.
Pounds | Sales Price | Total | Additional Costs | |||||||||||||
Product | Produced | Per Pound | Sales | to Process Further | NRV | |||||||||||
Woven | 24,000 | x | 8 | = | 192,000 | - | 120,000 = | 72,000 | ||||||||
Tight-Knitted | 66,000 | x | 10 | = | 660,000 | - | 140,000 = | 520,000 | ||||||||
Total | Joint | Allocated | ||||||||||||||
Product | NRV | NRV | Costs | Joint Costs | ||||||||||||
Woven | 72,000 | ÷ | 592,000 | x | 70,000 | = | 8,514 | |||||||||
Tight-Knitted | 520,000 | ÷ | 592,000 | x | 70,000 | = | 61,486 |
592,000
2. Tight-Knitted Costs Sold
$61,486 ÷ 66,000 x 60,000 = $55,897
$140,000 ÷ 66,000 x 60,000 = $127,273
Woven | Tight-Knitted | |||||||
Fabric | Fabric | Lint | Total | |||||
Sales | $192,000 | $600,000 | $10,000 | $802,000 | ||||
Joint Costs | 8,514 | 55,897 | 10,000 | 74,410 | ||||
Further Processing Costs | 120,000 | 127,273 | - | 247,273 | ||||
Gross Margin | $63,486 | $416,830 | - | $480,317 |
b.
1.
Pounds | Sales Price | Total | Additional Costs | ||||||
Product | Produced | Per Pound | Sales | to Process Further | NRV | ||||
Woven | 24,000 | x | 8 | = | 192,000 | - | 120,000 | = | 72,000 |
Tight-Knitted | 66,000 | x | 10 | = | 660,000 | - | 140,000 | = | 520,000 |
Total | Joint | Allocated | |||||||
Product | NRV | NRV | Costs | Joint Costs | |||||
Woven | 72,000 | ÷ | 592,000 | x | 80,000 | = | 9,730 | ||
Tight-Knitted | 520,000 | ÷ | 592,000 | x | 80,000 | = | 70,270 | ||
592,000 |
2. Tight-Knitted Costs Sold
$70,270 ÷ 66,000 x 60,000 = $63,882
$140,000 ÷ 66,000 x 60,000 = $127,273
Woven | Tight-Knitted | ||||||||
Fabric | Fabric | Lint | Total | ||||||
Sales | $192,000 | $600,000 | $10,000 | $802,000 | |||||
Joint Costs | 9,730 | 63,882 | - | 73,612 | |||||
Further Processing Costs | 120,000 | 127,273 | - | 247,273 | |||||
Gross Margin | $62,270 | $408,845 | $10,000 | $481,115 |
c.
1. Production Method
Costs transferred to FG Inventory 201,486 from part a3
Costs transferred to COGS 183,170 from part a4
Costs in FG Inventory 18,316
2. Sales Method
Costs transferred to FG Inventory 210,270 from part a3
Costs transferred to COGS 191,155 from part a4
Costs in FG Inventory 19,115
d.
Final | Additional Costs | Sales Value | Inc (Dec) | ||||
Product | Sales Value | to Process Further | Before Split-Off | in Profits | |||
Woven Fabric | 192,000 | - | 120,000 | - | 80,000 | = | (8,000) |
Tight-Knitted Fabric | 660,000 | - | 140,000 | - | 360,000 | = | 160,000 |
131. Red Hot manufactures a variety of red products. Each product has a market and can be sold as-is or processed further. Four of the products use a joint process costing $25,000. Red Hots can be sold for $2 per pound or processed further for $21,000 and sold for $2.50 per pound. Smokin Reds can be sold for $3.50 per pound or processed further for $18,500 and sold for $5 per pound. Little Reds can be sold for $5 per pound or processed further for $23,000 and sold for $6 per pound. Red Peppers can be sold for $8 per pound or processed further for $15,000 and sold for $10.50 per pound.
The following table shows how many pounds were produced of each product. Even if the products are processed further, the pounds produced will remain the same.
Pounds
Product Produced
Red Hots 30,000
Smokin Reds 25,000
Little Reds 21,000
Red Peppers 12,000
Instructions
a. Red Hot does not plan to process any of the products further. Allocate the joint costs using the sales at split-off method and calculate the gross margin for each product.
b. Red Hot does not plan to process any of the products further. Allocate the joint costs using the sales at physical quantities method and calculate the gross margin for each product.
c. Red Hot plans to process all of products further. Allocate the joint costs using the sales at NRV method and calculate the gross margin for each product.
d. If Red Hots does not plan to process any of the products further and the current sales value per pound is accurate, which method should the company use to allocate joint costs?
e. If Red Hots plans to produce all the products further, which method should the company use to allocate joint costs?
f. Which product or products should the company process further and which product or products should the company sell as-is? Be sure to justify your answer with calculations.
g. If the company takes your suggestions in part f, calculate the new gross margin of the company if the company uses the NRV method to allocate joint costs, and only the product or products recommended in part f are processed further.
h. What is the overall effect on gross margin by only processing further the products identified in part f versus not processing any of the products further.
i. What is the overall effect on gross margin by only processing further the products identified in part f versus processing all of the products further?
Ans: N/A, LO 2, 3 Bloom: AN, Difficulty: Medium, AACSB: Analytic, AICPA: FC, Decision Modeling, IMA: Cost Management.
Answer:
a. Red Hots - $55,696
Smoking Reds - $81,223
Little Reds - $97,468
Red Peppers - $89,113
b. Red Hots - $51,447
Smoking Reds - $80,398
Little Reds - $99,034
Red Peppers - $92,591
c. Red Hots - $50,395
Smoking Reds - $99,391
Little Reds - $96,124
Red Peppers - $103,590
d. The company should use the sales value at split-off method.
e. The company should use the NRV method.
f. Smokin Reds and Red Peppers should be processed further. They will increase profits by $19,000 and $15,000 respectively. The other two products will decrease profits, Red Hots and Little Reds, by $6,000 and $2,000, respectively.
g. Red Hots – $56,078
Smoking Reds - $99,539
Little Reds - $98,137
Red Peppers - $103,745
h. Increase of $34,000
i. Decrease of $8,000
Solution:
a.
Pounds | Sales Price | Totals Sales | |||
Product | Produced | Per Pound | at Split-off | ||
Red Hots | 30,000 | x | 2.00 | = | 60,000 |
Smokin Reds | 25,000 | x | 3.50 | = | 87,500 |
Little Reds | 21,000 | x | 5.00 | = | 105,000 |
Red Peppers | 12,000 | x | 8.00 | = | 96,000 |
Totals Sales | Joint | Allocated | |||||
Product | at Split-off | Costs | Costs | ||||
Red Hots | 60,000 | ÷ | 348,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 4,304 |
Smokin Reds | 87,500 | ÷ | 348,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 6,277 |
Little Reds | 105,000 | ÷ | 348,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 7,532 |
Red Peppers | 96,000 | ÷ | 348,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 6,887 |
348,500 |
Smokin | Little | Red | |||||||
Red Hots | Red | Reds | Peppers | Total | |||||
Sales | 60,000 | 87,500 | 105,000 | 96,000 | 348,500 | ||||
Costs | 4,304 | 6,277 | 7,532 | 6,887 | 25,000 | ||||
Gross Margin | 55,696 | 81,223 | 97,468 | 89,113 | 323,500 |
b.
Pounds | Joint | Allocated | |||||
Product | Produced | Costs | Costs | ||||
Red Hots | 30,000 | ÷ | 88,000 | x | 25,000 | = | 8,523 |
Smokin Reds | 25,000 | ÷ | 88,000 | x | 25,000 | = | 7,102 |
Little Reds | 21,000 | ÷ | 88,000 | x | 25,000 | = | 5,966 |
Red Peppers | 12,000 | ÷ | 88,000 | x | 25,000 | = | 3,409 |
88,000 |
Smokin | Little | Red | ||||||||||||||||||
Red Hots | Red | Reds | Peppers | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Sales | 60,000 | 87,500 | 105,000 | 96,000 | 348,500 | |||||||||||||||
Costs | 8,523 | 7,102 | 5,966 | 3,409 | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Margin | 51,477 | 80,398 | 99,034 | 92,591 | 323,500 |
c.
Pounds | Sales Price | Final | Additional Costs | ||||||
Product | Produced | Per Pound | Sales Value | to Process Further | NRV | ||||
Red Hots | 30,000 | x | 2.50 | = | 75,000 | - | 21,000 | = | 54,000 |
Smokin Reds | 25,000 | x | 5.00 | = | 125,000 | - | 18,500 | = | 106,500 |
Little Reds | 21,000 | x | 6.00 | = | 126,000 | - | 23,000 | = | 103,000 |
Red Peppers | 12,000 | x | 10.50 | = | 126,000 | - | 15,000 | = | 111,000 |
Joint | Allocated | ||||||
Product | NRV | Costs | Costs | ||||
Red Hots | 54,000 | ÷ | 374,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 3,605 |
Smokin Reds | 106,500 | ÷ | 374,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 7,109 |
Little Reds | 103,000 | ÷ | 374,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 6,876 |
Red Peppers | 111,000 | ÷ | 374,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 7,410 |
374,500 |
Smokin | Little | Red | |||||||
Red Hots | Red | Reds | Peppers | Total | |||||
Sales | 75,000 | 125,000 | 126,000 | 126,000 | 452,000 | ||||
Costs | 24,605 | 25,609 | 29,876 | 22,410 | 102,500 | ||||
Gross Margin | 50,395 | 99,391 | 96,124 | 103,590 | 349,500 |
f.
Final Sales | Totals Sales | Additional Costs | Net Increase | ||||
Product | Value * | at Split-off ** | to Process Further | (Decrease) | |||
Red Hots | 75,000 | - | 60,000 | - | 21,000 | = | (6,000) |
Smokin Reds | 125,000 | - | 87,500 | - | 18,500 | = | 19,000 |
Little Reds | 126,000 | - | 105,000 | - | 23,000 | = | (2,000) |
Red Peppers | 126,000 | - | 96,000 | - | 15,000 | = | 15,000 |
26,000 |
* From part a
** from part c
g.
Pounds | Sales Price | Final | Additional Costs | ||||||
Product | Produced | Per Pound | Sales Value | to Process Further | NRV | ||||
Red Hots | 30,000 | x | 2.00 | = | 60,000 | - | = | 60,000 | |
Smokin Reds | 25,000 | x | 5.00 | = | 125,000 | - | 18,500 | = | 106,500 |
Little Reds | 21,000 | x | 5.00 | = | 105,000 | - | = | 105,000 | |
Red Peppers | 12,000 | x | 10.50 | = | 126,000 | - | 15,000 | = | 111,000 |
Joint | Allocated | ||||||
Product | NRV | Costs | Costs | ||||
Red Hots | 60,000 | ÷ | 382,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 3,922 |
Smokin Reds | 106,500 | ÷ | 382,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 6,961 |
Little Reds | 105,000 | ÷ | 382,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 6,863 |
Red Peppers | 111,000 | ÷ | 382,500 | x | 25,000 | = | 7,255 |
382,500 |
Smokin | Little | Red | |||||||
Red Hots | Red | Reds | Peppers | Total | |||||
Sales | 60,000 | 125,000 | 105,000 | 126,000 | 416,000 | ||||
Costs | 3,922 | 25,461 | 6,863 | 22,255 | 58,500 | ||||
Gross Margin | 56,078 | 99,539 | 98,137 | 103,745 | 357,500 |
h. Gross Margin (from part g) $357,500
Gross Margin (from part a) 323,500
Difference 34,000
i. Gross Margin (from part g) $357,500
Gross Margin (from part c) 349,500
Difference 8,000
Document Information
Connected Book
Chapter Test Bank | Cost Accounting & Analytics 1e
By Karen Congo Farmer