Analysis Of Variance Chapter 7 1st Edition Exam Prep - Statistics for Criminology 1e | Test Bank Cooper by Jonathon A. Cooper. DOCX document preview.

Analysis Of Variance Chapter 7 1st Edition Exam Prep

Chapter 7: Analysis of Variance

  1. Let’s assume you randomly draw three samples of correction officers from a single facility (50 black/50 white/50 other). You aim to find whether they have ever been a victim of sexual assault or harassment within the correction facility (yes/no). Your friend tells you to run an ANOVA to determine whether there is a difference between white, black, and other correction officers. Will you follow your friends’ suggestion? Explain.
  2. Although the social climate surrounding sexual identity is slowly changing toward more tolerance, individuals who are female or transsexual still experience stigma regarding their sexual identity. Assume you have a master list of students enrolled in a large public high school in Portland (OR) and the list also includes their sexual identity. You randomly select 10 students who self-identify as female, 10 who self-identify as male, and 10 who self-identify as transgender. You want to know how accepted they feel by their teachers (with 1 indicating feeling marginalized and 10 indicating a feeling of being 100% accepted). You select an alpha level of 0.05. The results are presented in the table below.
    1. What is the IV and what is the DV? Also indicate the level of measurement for each variable.
    2. State your null and alternative hypotheses.
    3. Compute:
      1. The group mean.
      2. Grand mean.
      3. Standard deviation for each group.
      4. Sum of squares.
      5. The degrees of freedom (within and between).
      6. F.
    4. State the decision rule.
    5. Make a decision and interpret your findings.
    6. Use the Scheffé test to determine which means (if any) significantly differ from each other.

Male

Female

Transgender

8

9

5

7

8

3

5

10

6

9

5

2

10

10

7

6

8

4

2

7

7

4

4

5

7

10

3

3

5

8

  1. We know from research that poverty is a criminogenic risk factor. You select a random sample of 50 adolescents (age 24 and younger) with a criminal record who are still living with their parents from a diverse neighborhood in Orlando (FL) (with known household income/year). You group them into four categories: poverty ($0–$23,000; low income ($23,001–$35,000); lower middle class ($35,000–$55,000); upper middle class ($55,001–$150,000), and high income ($150,001+). You are interested to find whether the average age of onset (understood as a conviction; FL has no minimum age for criminal responsibility) varies between individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds. You select an alpha level of 0.05. The results are to be found in the table below.
    1. What is the IV and what is the DV? Also indicate the level of measurement for each variable.
    2. State your null and alternative hypotheses.
    3. Compute:
      1. The group mean.
      2. Grand mean.
      3. Standard deviation for each group.
      4. Sum of squares.
      5. The degrees of freedom (within and between).
      6. F.
    4. State the decision rule.
    5. Make a decision and interpret your findings.
    6. Use the Scheffé test to determine which means (if any) significantly differ from each other.

Poverty

Low income

Lower middle class

Upper middle class

High income

11

9

16

13

16

12

15

15

15

17

13

16

14

16

18

16

16

18

18

17

8

18

17

14

15

11

13

17

21

11

9

11

11

20

15

7

13

24

19

21

10

15

21

15

17

8

22

18

17

16

  1. Building on Burgess’s (1925) concentric zone theory, Shaw and McKay (1930) developed social disorganization theory. Social disorganization of neighborhoods is, according to Shaw and McKay (1942), characterized by a combination of persistent poverty, racial/ethnical heterogeneity, transiency (rapid/frequent population turnover), and urbanism, which in turn is fueling the disruption of core social institutions, such as the family, the church community, and schools. It was hypothesized that crime is more likely to occur in the core of the city and the enclosing zone in transition, with crime decreasing with the distance from the center. In the contemporary United States, an invert trend can be witnessed. Urban revitalization appears to invert Burgess’s concentric zone theory and Shaw and McKay’s (1930) social disorganization theory, with more and more wealthy and educated individuals moving back into the core. You want to test this inverse trend by analyzing the levels of perceived neighborhood problems (using a scale of 1–15, where 15 represents the highest level of perceived neighborhood problems) of a random sample of 40 individuals living in Minneapolis and its suburbs. Although Burgess’s concentric zone theory entails five zones (central business district, zone in transition, working man, residential, and commuter), you decide to compare the mean levels of perceived neighborhood problems of residents from downtown, residential areas, and suburbs. You select an alpha level of 0.05. The descriptive information is presented in the table below.
    1. Indicate which variable is the IV and which is the DV. Also indicate the level of measurement for each variable.
    2. State your null and alternative hypotheses.
    3. Compute:
      1. The group mean.
      2. Grand mean.
      3. Standard deviation for each group.
      4. Sum of squares.
      5. The degrees of freedom (within and between).
      6. F.
    4. State the decision rule.
    5. Make a decision and interpret your findings.

Downtown

Residential

Suburbs

8

5

13

7

7

10

5

9

14

10

11

11

11

6

8

8

8

6

9

10

13

13

6

12

12

4

11

10

8

9

6

8

6

12

12

14

9

12

7

12

Male

x12

Female

x22

Trans-gender

x32

8

64

1.9

3.61

9

81

1.4

1.96

5

25

0

0

7

49

0.9

0.81

8

64

0.4

0.16

3

9

–2

4

5

25

–1.1

1.21

10

100

2.4

5.76

6

36

1

1

9

81

2.9

8.41

5

25

–2.6

6.76

2

4

–3

9

10

100

3.9

15.21

10

100

2.4

5.76

7

49

2

4

6

36

–0.1

0.01

8

64

0.4

0.16

4

16

–1

1

2

4

–4.1

16.81

7

49

–0.6

0.36

7

49

2

4

4

16

–2.1

4.41

4

16

–3.6

12.96

5

25

0

0

7

49

0.9

0.81

10

100

2.4

5.76

3

9

–2

4

3

9

–3.1

9.61

5

25

–2.6

6.76

8

64

3

9

61

433

60.9

76

624

46.4

50

286

36

6.1

7.6

5

Sum of Squares

6.77

Standard Deviation

2.60

Sum of Squares

5.16

Standard Deviation

2.27

Sum of Squares

4

Standard Deviation

2

Poverty

x12

Low

x22

Low/Middle

x32

Upper Middle

x42

High

x52

11

121

0.5

0.25

9

81

-5.8

33.64

16

256

-1.1

1.21

13

169

-3.8

14.44

16

256

-0.3

0.09

12

144

1.5

2.25

15

225

0.2

0.04

15

225

-2.1

4.41

15

225

-1.8

3.24

17

289

0.7

0.49

13

169

2.5

6.25

16

256

1.2

1.44

14

196

-3.1

9.61

16

256

-0.8

0.64

18

324

1.7

2.89

16

256

5.5

30.25

16

256

1.2

1.44

18

324

0.9

0.81

18

324

1.2

1.44

17

289

0.7

0.49

8

64

-2.5

6.25

18

324

3.2

10.24

17

289

-0.1

0.01

14

196

-2.8

7.84

15

225

-1.3

1.69

11

121

0.5

0.25

13

169

-1.8

3.24

17

289

-0.1

0.01

21

441

4.2

17.64

11

121

-5.3

28.09

9

81

-1.5

2.25

11

121

-3.8

14.44

11

121

-6.1

37.21

20

400

3.2

10.24

15

225

-1.3

1.69

7

49

-3.5

12.25

13

169

-1.8

3.24

24

576

6.9

47.61

19

361

2.2

4.84

21

441

4.7

22.09

10

100

-0.5

0.25

15

225

0.2

0.04

21

441

3.9

15.21

15

225

-1.8

3.24

17

289

0.7

0.49

8

64

-2.5

6.25

22

484

7.2

51.84

18

324

0.9

0.81

17

289

0.2

0.04

16

256

-0.3

0.09

105

1169

148

2310

171

3041

168

2886

163

2715

10.50

14.80

17.10

16.80

16.30

Sum of Squares

7.39

Standard Deviation

2.72

Sum of Squares

13.29

Standard Deviation

3.65

Sum of Squares

12.99

Standard Deviation

3.60

Sum of Squares

7.07

Standard Deviation

2.66

Sum of Squares

6.46

Standard Deviation

2.54

Downtown

x12

Residential

x22

Suburbs

X32

8

64

–1.27

1.6129

5

25

–2.83

8.0089

13

169

2.31

5.3361

7

49

–2.27

5.1529

7

49

–0.83

0.6889

10

100

–0.69

0.4761

5

25

–4.27

18.2329

9

81

1.17

1.3689

14

196

3.31

10.9561

10

100

0.73

0.5329

11

121

3.17

10.0489

11

121

0.31

0.0961

11

121

1.73

2.9929

6

36

–1.83

3.3489

8

64

–2.69

7.2361

8

64

–1.27

1.6129

8

64

0.17

0.0289

6

36

–4.69

21.9961

9

81

–0.27

0.0729

10

100

2.17

4.7089

13

169

2.31

5.3361

13

169

3.73

13.9129

6

36

–1.83

3.3489

12

144

1.31

1.7161

12

144

2.73

7.4529

4

16

–3.83

14.6689

11

121

0.31

0.0961

10

100

0.73

0.5329

8

64

0.17

0.0289

9

81

–1.69

2.8561

6

36

–3.27

10.6929

8

64

0.17

0.0289

6

36

–4.69

21.9961

12

144

2.73

7.4529

12

144

4.17

17.3889

14

196

3.31

10.9561

9

81

–0.27

0.0729

12

144

1.31

1.7161

7

49

–2.27

5.1529

12

144

2.73

7.4529

139

1371

82.9335

94

800

63.6668

139

1577

90.7693

9.267

7.83

10.69

Sum of Squares

5.92

Standard Deviation

2.43

Sum of Squares

5.79

Standard Deviation

2.41

Sum of Squares

7.56

Standard Deviation

2.75

Document Information

Document Type:
DOCX
Chapter Number:
7
Created Date:
Aug 21, 2025
Chapter Name:
Chapter 7 Analysis Of Variance
Author:
Jonathon A. Cooper

Connected Book

Statistics for Criminology 1e | Test Bank Cooper

By Jonathon A. Cooper

Test Bank General
View Product →

$24.99

100% satisfaction guarantee

Buy Full Test Bank

Benefits

Immediately available after payment
Answers are available after payment
ZIP file includes all related files
Files are in Word format (DOCX)
Check the description to see the contents of each ZIP file
We do not share your information with any third party